The Values Debate
The war on terrorism is not just about security or military tactics. It is a battle of values, and one that can only be won by the triumph of tolerance and liberty. Afghanistan and Iraq have been the necessary starting points of this battle. Success there, however, must be coupled with a bolder, more consistent, and more thorough application of global values, with Washington leading the way.
To the Editor:
One wonders what Queen Elizabeth I, as England faced Philip II's armada and Catholic Europe, or Winston Churchill, as the United Kingdom battled Hitler and Nazi Germany, would have made of Prime Minister Tony Blair's statement following the September 11 attacks that "we could have chosen security as the battleground. But we did not. We chose values." ("A Battle for Global Values," January/February 2007).
A political leader's first obligation is to national security. Values are a collective ethos of a country or people and should be exported by example, not at the point of a gun. By cloaking the Iraq war in talk of "values," Blair and President George W. Bush began what may be the greatest and most tragic failure in the story of Anglo-American foreign policy.
John L. Eastman
New York City
Related
Pakistani militant groups are killing civilians and engaging in terrorism in Indian-held Kashmir under the guise of holy war. The government in Islamabad supports these militants and their religious schools as cheap ways to fight India and educate Pakistan's youth. But this policy is creating a culture of violence that exacerbates internal sectarianism and destabilizes the region. Without change, this monster threatens to devour Pakistani society.
President Bush is only half right to trumpet the spread of freedom as the main objective of U.S. foreign policy; the pursuit of justice is just as important. Broadening the focus would not only befit the United States' political tradition, but also help neutralize opposition from radical Islamists and critics of globalization.
Germans always knew that their foreign minister, Joschka Fischer, had been a leftist activist in the 1960s and 1970s. More controversial were recent disclosures that he had once assaulted a police officer and may have had links to terrorists. Fischer's evolution is the tale of a generation that changed Germany -- and then itself.
