All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes
This important book asks two questions about the governance of the world economy: Who sets the rules, and what explains the diverse ways in which the world economy is regulated? In an age of growing interdependence, states are increasingly forced to negotiate over issues as diverse as the environment, health and safety standards, pharmaceutical patents, and banking and monetary policy. Some observers see states inevitably relinquishing authority over the world economy to governmental bodies or private multilateral firms. Drezner, however, argues that leading states are still in control of the world economy, fashioning regulatory agreements -- as they have in the past -- when functional demands exist and their interests converge. Globalization merely increases the rewards for the major powers for coordinating their policies -- and they tend to do so unless the domestic "adjustment costs" are too great. Drezner shows that it is control of their own large domestic markets that give major states the ability to wield power in the global economy. His main contribution, however, is to explode a popular notion of globalization and thereby to set an agenda for the study of global regulatory politics. For social movements seeking to shape the governance of the world economy, all roads still lead to the state.
Related
Robert Gilpin fears that globalization is at risk because the Cold War-era foundations of today's liberal capitalist order are eroding. In fact, they are stronger than ever.
The next Democratic president should build on Bill Clinton's legacy of embracing globalization and easing its downsides. This means developing a new system of global economic relations based on American leadership, open markets, engagement with China and other emerging markets, and stronger multilateral regimes to handle transnational challenges such as the environment, labor rights, and the information economy. A new world will need a global New Deal.
Only a few years ago pundits were sure that the United States was losing to Asia and Europe and had to emulate their more state- directed economies to remain competitive. Now the conventional wisdom is that America is number one and that the rest of the world should adopt its more laissez-faire approach. In fact, neither caricature is right. Asia was booming and now it is slumping, but it will be back. Europe's underlying ossification will persist. But most important, while the U.S. economy is in a period of robust growth, nothing fundamental has changed. Its long-run growth rate has not accelerated, productivity has not risen, and the structural unemployment rate has fallen by one percentage point at most. Come the next recession, all this triumphalism will seem silly.
