Five Day in August: How World War II Became a Nuclear War; The Columbia Guide to Hiroshima and the Bomb
Views on the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been shaped by both the startling destructive effect and the immediate political effect. This led to a continuing controversy about whether the political effect (Japan's surrender) was a consequence of the destructive effect or could have been achieved without it. Gordin's thesis is that the Americans surprised themselves as much as the Japanese. Those responsible for the decision to use the bomb did not fully appreciate that this was something much more than a more powerful version of existing weapons. A short and accessible account of the decision-making and tactical considerations that preceded the bomb's use is welcome, but Gordin's thesis is overstated. Many in the military were skeptical about whether an atomic bomb could add much to the destructive capacity they had already perfected, and the politicians dared not depend on its ending the war, so they pursued all other available strategies as well. But the scientists and politicians closest to the project well understood the fearsome nature of the weapon if it worked as advertised.
For those who want to explore further, an excellent place to start is Kort's guide to the debate on Hiroshima. In addition to lucid and careful summaries of the issues, a particular virtue of this book is the substantial and well-chosen collection of documents from American and Japanese sources.
Related
Kim Jong Un is likely to continue his father's policies, keeping the country what it is now -- a nuclear-armed dictatorship in abject poverty -- until it can no longer sustain itself.
Though initially hailed for his "bulldozer" Balkan leadership, Chirac's nuclear testing and fiscal austerity have alienated the public and cut his honeymoon short.
As Cold War threats have diminished, so-called weapons of mass destruction -- nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and ballistic missiles -- have become the new international bugbears. The irony is that the harm caused by these weapons pales in comparison to the havoc wreaked by a much more popular tool: economic sanctions. Tally up the casualties caused by rogue states, terrorists, and unconventional weapons, and the number is surprisingly small. The same cannot be said for deaths inflicted by international sanctions. The math is sobering and should lead the United States to reconsider its current policy of strangling Iraq.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.