Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler: The Age of Social Catastrophe
On one level, Gellately's book is a well-told but familiar narrative of the horrors committed in Germany and Russia between the start of World War I and the end of World War II. On another level is Gellately's more provocative thesis: that Lenin should be ranked alongside Hitler and Stalin as "one of the three truly vile despots of the first half of the twentieth century" -- a revision of the tendency of most recent historians to see Hitler and Stalin in a class of their own. Whereas Hitler was for years viewed as uniquely evil, revelations about Soviet crimes -- from the collectivization of farms in the 1920s and 1930s to the gulag -- led to Stalin's "elevation" to a similar rank. (See, for example, Alan Bullock's masterful Hitler and Stalin.) Gellately persuasively shows Lenin to be as willing as the other two dictators to employ any means necessary to achieve his political goals. But his revisionism is not entirely convincing -- if only because Lenin died before he had the chance to kill on Hitler's and Stalin's scale.
Related
For the first time in a generation, there is real hope for peace in Northern Ireland. A fortunate political constellation in Britain, the United States, and Ireland provided the impetus to make the compromises needed for a viable pact. But the Good Friday Agreement is fragile. It survived its first major challenge, this summer's marching season and its attendant strife, only by a grim kind of Irish luck: a brutal bombing that killed three boys and inspired both unionists and republicans to renew their commitment to the accord. The province's new government will face more such challenges, and its ability to overcome them depends on a few good men.
Americans generally belittle the role of ethnic nationalism in politics. But in fact, it corresponds to some enduring propensities of the human spirit, it is galvanized by modernization, and in one form or another, it will drive global politics for generations to come. Once ethnic nationalism has captured the imagination of groups in a multiethnic society, ethnic disaggregation or partition is often the least bad answer.
In "Saving NATO From Europe," (November/December 2004), Jeffrey L. Cimbalo warns that a dagger is pointed at the heart of the Atlantic alliance, and the murder weapon is the European Union's draft constitution. Ratification of that document, Cimbalo asserts, would have "profound and troubling implications for the transatlantic alliance and for future U.S. influence in Europe." Washington, he believes, should "end its uncritical support for European integration" and work with its friends in Europe to halt the EU process and save NATO from an untimely death.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.