Americans and Europeans: Dancing in the Dark; Repairing the Damage: Possibilities and Limits of Transatlantic Consensus
In the aftermath of the greatest transatlantic crisis in at least 50 years -- the U.S.-European split over the war in Iraq -- analysts on both sides of the Atlantic have been trying to understand its causes, weigh its importance, and offer suggestions for repairing the breach. These two recent studies reach the similar conclusion that concerted efforts will be required to repair the relationship. Bark is most interested in the social, historical, and cultural factors that divide (and sometimes unite) Europe and the United States. He focuses on the "essential difference" that Europe is run from the "top down" while the United States works from the "bottom up." The idea is not original, but it is presented with exceptional clarity, substantiated by solid evidence and telling anecdotes, and offered without a trace of the caricature that often accompanies sweeping judgments about "Europeans" and "Americans."
The Adelphi Paper's authors -- experienced experts from the United States and France -- share Bark's guarded optimism that the transatlantic split can be overcome with better manners and more mutual respect, and they offer ten propositions for future transatlantic security consensus. They recognize structural differences between Europe and the United States on issues such as the war on terrorism, nuclear proliferation, and the Middle East but seek to demonstrate that common ground exists. Neither study, however, entirely dispels the concern that the future Atlantic alliance will consist of, in Bark's words, "fragmented coalitions of expediency between America and individual European countries."
Related
Somehow the Americans went from claiming they did not have a dog in the Bosnia fight to redrawing the map of the Balkans over Scotch with the ruthless Slobodan Milosevi,c. But the Dayton Accord that ended Bosnia's war has been oversold. It is the product not of Wilsonian idealism but of a reluctant realpolitik. Had Washington intervened in 1993, as Bill Clinton promised to, 100,000 lives could have been saved. Dayton has strengthened the two nastiest dictators in the region, Serbia's Milosevi,c and Croatia's Franjo Tudjman, and edged toward accepting the de facto partition of Bosnia. The violence in Kosovo today is a reminder of the costs of appeasing aggressors.
For the first time in a generation, there is real hope for peace in Northern Ireland. A fortunate political constellation in Britain, the United States, and Ireland provided the impetus to make the compromises needed for a viable pact. But the Good Friday Agreement is fragile. It survived its first major challenge, this summer's marching season and its attendant strife, only by a grim kind of Irish luck: a brutal bombing that killed three boys and inspired both unionists and republicans to renew their commitment to the accord. The province's new government will face more such challenges, and its ability to overcome them depends on a few good men.
Noel Malcolm's history of Serbia's flashpoint province is marred by his sympathies for its ethnic Albanian separatists, anti-Serbian bias, and illusions about the Balkans.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.