Winning the Right War: The Path to Security for America and the World
The Bush administration's framing of the United States' post-9/11 national security challenge as a "war on terror" has profoundly influenced the nation's worldview and twenty-first-century grand strategy. In this small, profoundly sensible book, Gordon questions the entire intellectual edifice of the "war on terror" and offers an alternative strategy of containment and engagement. Like others, Gordon argues that the language of war evokes the wrong strategic imagery, mischaracterizing the nature of the enemy, the causes of terrorism, and what the appropriate tools of the struggle are. Gordon proposes that if the conflict must be called a war, the United States should be fighting a very different one, recognizing that "victory is more likely to be achieved by maintaining America's strength, cohesion, and appeal than by destroying its enemies through the force of arms." Gordon suggests that Washington should borrow insights from its Cold War-era struggle with Soviet communism. This means patiently managing threats, preserving the values of U.S. society, and winning over friends and allies. Gordon wants to rebuild U.S. credibility and appeal as a global leader, tackle the hard problem of energy dependence, and shift emphasis in the Middle East from Iraq to building a wider regional coalition to pursue peace between Israel and the Palestinians and to adopting a containment-plus-overtures approach to Iran. A glimmer of the United States' next grand strategy appears in these pages.
Related
Jimmy Carter's high-profile parachutes for peace earn scorn from some and admiration from others. From Haiti to North Korea, the ubiquitous former president helps resolve disputes with his unshakable confidence in the power of moral suasion. But Carter's penchant for bucking U.S. foreign policy has strained his relations with the Washington establishment, and the Clinton administration has not always treated him with the respect he deserves. Lost in the controversy are the humanitarian achievements on which his reputation will ultimately rest.
Richard Holbrooke's gripping memoir shows how he improvised a makeshift peace in what was left of Bosnia despite a timorous Pentagon, a reluctant president, waweirding allies, and brutal ethnic cleansers. But the Dayton Accord came too late.
The difference between the factions in Bosnia is not morality, as the Bosnian Muslims and Western press insist, but power and opportunity. All have the same goal: to avoid living as a minority. All have committed crimes against other ethnic groups. Despite its claims of neutrality and preaching against military solutions, the United States has favored the Bosnian Muslims, keeping silent as they launched offensives from U.N.-guarded safe areas. Since air strikes cannot resolve the conflict, the United States must discourage violence by all sides and let Russia--the one country Serbs trust--take the lead in negotiations.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.