The Price of Fear: The Truth Behind the Financial War on Terror
This book is a well-reasoned critique, amounting to a stinging indictment, of the financial "war on terror" as it has been practiced by the U.S. government since 9/11. The working assumption has been that it is possible to stifle terrorist organizations by cutting off their funding and that this can be done effectively through a series of regulations applied to banks and by denying organizations that are suspected of supporting terrorism access to banks. Warde argues that this approach misconceives the nature and motivation of terrorists, the amount of money they need to carry out their terrorist acts, and the channels through which they can acquire the necessary funds. Although the government has trumpeted the success of the financial war on terrorism, that success is hard to square with the evident ability of terrorist organizations to continue to recruit and carry on their activities, at least outside the United States. At the same time, the collateral damage to innocent parties has been considerable, building resentment at home and abroad. Even after the rhetoric, and to some extent the policies, has been altered in other dimensions of the war on terrorism, the use of financial penalties continues without much critical scrutiny by the press or the public -- a deficiency this book helps rectify.
Related
The failure to prevent the September 11, 2001, attacks or find Iraqi WMD have put intelligence at the center of this year's presidential campaign. The key to better performance, however, lies not in major reforms but in the character and sense of responsible officials.
Iran is the one sore spot in an otherwise highly cooperative German-American relationship. The United States has sought to punish the Islamic state for sponsoring terrorism. Germany has tried to maintain a "critical dialogue" of limited diplomacy and commerce, much as its Ostpolitik tried to engage Soviet bloc nations during the Cold War. U.S. officials decry Germany's shady dealings and billions of dollars in loans and credits to Iran. When challenged, German officials charge the United States with hypocrisy. Lurking behind the dispute is an uncomfortable fact: in a world without the Cold War, "rogue states" are not threatening enough to force accord among Western nations.
By stressing unilateralism over cooperation, preemption over prevention, and firepower over staying power, the Bush administration has alienated the United States' natural allies and disengaged from many of the world's most pressing problems. To restore U.S. global standing--which is essential in checking the spread of lethal weapons and winning the war on terrorism--the next Democratic president must recognize the obvious: that means are as important as ends.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.