How Capitalism Was Built: The Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, and Central Asia
Here are two books by a close student of postcommunist transitions. The first, an extensive revision and expansion of an earlier book, examines all the former communist countries to emerge from the Soviet bloc, describing and evaluating the transition from centrally planned to market economies and analyzing what did and did not work. An important finding is that radical reform produced better and more durable economic performance than gradual reform and also contributed to establishing democratic political institutions, even though the immediate postreform period was painful.
The second book focuses on Russia alone. It is largely a chronological history of Russia's economic reforms, starting with those introduced by Mikhail Gorbachev in 1985. Not surprisingly, it contains some of the same analytic themes as the first book. In Aslund's view, capitalism has been effectively established in Russia, bolstered by a thriving private sector in a thriving economy. Russia's political institutions, in contrast, have reverted to a tsarist-type authoritarianism under President Vladimir Putin. The book lucidly explains the reasons for these contrasting outcomes in Russia, which are markedly different from those in most of the postcommunist eastern European countries. Åslund sees the two developments as incompatible in the long run and places his bets on an evolution toward democracy.
Related
War-ravaged Bosnia has come a long way since the 1995 Dayton Accord. But Bosnia's stability rests on the West's large-scale involvement. Integration remains an unfulfilled hope. When foreign aid tapers off, as it soon will, Bosnia's economy will grind to a halt without major reforms. The world should safeguard Dayton's biggest success -- ending Europe's bloodiest war since World War II -- but hand Bosnia's political and economic future back to Bosnians.
The EU agreement to refinance Greece's debt may have calmed the markets, but ongoing austerity measures across Europe are leave open potentially worrying side effect that policymakers have yet to address: the chance for China to buy sensitive assets at fire-sale prices.
The conviction is widely held in German political circles today that a phase of postwar development is ending and that the Federal Republic is approaching a new era of political, social and economic challenge. The reconstruction achieved in the years after the war led to a remarkable economic upsurge. But that success cannot make us overlook the continuing failure to solve our most outstanding political problem-that of reunification. A great deal of German energy and much-touted German industriousness has spent itself in the market place, while-for whatever reason-our number-one political problem has hardened in its status quo. The oft-cited "German phoenix" which rose out of the ashes has actually been paralyzed in one wing.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.