How Capitalism Was Built: The Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, and Central Asia
Here are two books by a close student of postcommunist transitions. The first, an extensive revision and expansion of an earlier book, examines all the former communist countries to emerge from the Soviet bloc, describing and evaluating the transition from centrally planned to market economies and analyzing what did and did not work. An important finding is that radical reform produced better and more durable economic performance than gradual reform and also contributed to establishing democratic political institutions, even though the immediate postreform period was painful.
The second book focuses on Russia alone. It is largely a chronological history of Russia's economic reforms, starting with those introduced by Mikhail Gorbachev in 1985. Not surprisingly, it contains some of the same analytic themes as the first book. In Aslund's view, capitalism has been effectively established in Russia, bolstered by a thriving private sector in a thriving economy. Russia's political institutions, in contrast, have reverted to a tsarist-type authoritarianism under President Vladimir Putin. The book lucidly explains the reasons for these contrasting outcomes in Russia, which are markedly different from those in most of the postcommunist eastern European countries. Åslund sees the two developments as incompatible in the long run and places his bets on an evolution toward democracy.
Related
European Monetary Union may be an economic undertaking, but it is as much about politics and the prospects for European integration as about pfennigs and francs.
The battle for the common currency may be remembered as one of the more useless in Europe's history. The euro is hailed as a solution to high unemployment, low growth, and the high costs of welfare states. But the deep budget cuts required before integration are already causing pain and may trigger severe recessions. If the European Monetary Union goes forward, a common currency will eliminate the adjustments now made by nominal exchange rates, and the central bank will control money with an iron fist. Labor markets will do the adjusting, a mechanism bound to fail, given those markets' inflexibility in Europe.
Though initially hailed for his "bulldozer" Balkan leadership, Chirac's nuclear testing and fiscal austerity have alienated the public and cut his honeymoon short.
