Churchill's Promised Land: Zionism and Statecraft
Previous studies of Winston Churchill's attitude toward "the Jewish question" have portrayed the great British leader as an unabashed Zionist whose position on the issue -- so different from many of his contemporaries -- resulted from his personal admiration and affection for Jews. Makovsky does not dispute that basic line but provides a more nuanced assessment, portraying Churchill's unquestionable Zionism as "subordinate" to other strategic, political, or imperial priorities. Thus, Churchill's support for Jewish causes was inconsistent -- understandably less of a priority when it clashed with his political interests after World War I or when it seemed too closely associated with the Bolshevism he despised, but higher on the agenda when he was out of office in the 1930s and after 1948, when he saw Israel as a potential strategic partner for the West. Makovsky also convincingly argues that Churchill, often portrayed as an archetypal "realist," had a "sentimental" view of Zionism: he liked and respected Jews and believed that a Jewish homeland would advance the cause of civilization. Churchill's Promised Land, however, is anything but sentimental; it is a rigorous and balanced study that puts Churchill's Zionism in perspective. More books will certainly be written about Churchill and the Jews, but probably not better ones.
Related
In "Saving NATO From Europe," (November/December 2004), Jeffrey L. Cimbalo warns that a dagger is pointed at the heart of the Atlantic alliance, and the murder weapon is the European Union's draft constitution. Ratification of that document, Cimbalo asserts, would have "profound and troubling implications for the transatlantic alliance and for future U.S. influence in Europe." Washington, he believes, should "end its uncritical support for European integration" and work with its friends in Europe to halt the EU process and save NATO from an untimely death.
Europe is about to create a unified military force. Done wrong, it could strain transatlantic relations and weaken European defense.
In recent months, many observers have concluded that the United States and Europe are on divergent paths and that the transatlantic alliance is crumbling. In spite of some real differences, however, American and European attitudes remain remarkably similar on most key issues. Basing policy on the false assumption of transatlantic divorce would only make it a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.