Killing Civilians: Method, Madness, and Morality in War
Slim explores the problem of restraint in war by considering how civilians can be spared its ravages. With painful and poignant examples, he describes deliberate extermination, planned massacres, rape, and the famine and disease associated with war. This is more than a collection of horror stories, let alone a pacifist tract. Slim understands why wars sometimes must be fought and that attempts are often made to try to spare civilians unnecessary harm, and he grasps how the moral force of the civil-military distinction is soon undermined by the brutish logic of war, especially in these days of asymmetric war, when insurgents are constantly trying to draw regular forces into civilian areas. Lacking confidence in appeals to humanitarian law, he struggles to think of ways to assert the core principle that "even in war, one should kill as little as possible." He explores the possibility of appeals to self-interest, fairness, and mercy. Any attempt to carve out a humanitarian space in the midst of bitter conflicts faces tough challenges, but Slim's book is an important reminder of why it is vital to try.
Related
Gross human rights violations in the former Yugoslavia-rape, torture, summary execution and mass internment-cannot go uncensured by the international community. A war crimes tribunal is a moral imperative and would go far toward deterring future criminals and defusing ethnic tensions in the Balkans. Although prosecution will be difficult, the alternative-doing nothing-is unacceptable. To abandon the process now, after the United Nations has already called for a tribunal, would make a mockery of international law. The moral legacy of the Nuremberg trials is at stake.
As western Sudan continues to suffer, much international attention has focused on whether to call what is happening there "genocide." Yet once the term was invoked, it did not trigger outside intervention. Terminology turns out to matter far less than was expected. And once more, the world has dithered while people die.
Kosovo's consequences were just the opposite of what NATO intended: suffering Kosovar civilians, regional instability, and a fuming Russia and China.
