National Identity and Globalization: Youth, State, and Society in Post-Soviet Eurasia
U.S. leaders and public intellectuals rarely fuss much over national identity -- even as the ethnic balance in the United States approaches a historic tipping point -- but the Russians and their post-Soviet neighbors do. The turmoil resulting from hurtling from one political and economic life to another wrecked the ballast of past values, frail as they had become, leaving each country's new leadership and elite much distracted by the need to build a refurbished base for the national idea. Add the inescapable and often competing effects of globalization, and the challenge of fashioning new national identities inspiring unity, attachment, and sacrifice in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Russia -- the three countries Blum compares -- grows mightily. Blum's focus is how the state and various nonstate actors go about distinguishing healthy from unhealthy values and then promoting the right ones among the young. Blum has produced a tightly argued and empirically rich yet succinct comparative portrait -- one deeply conversant with the immense literature on social and political identity. He finds that for all the differences, in the three countries the state and its de facto auxiliaries have wrestled in roughly similar fashion with the problems of parrying unwanted external influences, embracing those influences useful to modernization, and producing a workable amalgam respecting distinctive national values key to their agenda while also making room for the best globalization has to offer.
Related
With facts and a touch of fiction, Mikhail Gorbachev recounts the breakup of the Soviet Union and warns the West not to mangle the post-Cold War world.
Will Russia be run by democrats or oligarchs? The signs are worrying. The West would rather not dwell on the extent to which Russia's market is dominated by robber barons and permeated by crime and corruption. Russia's democracy is weak, with unfair election campaigns, a compromised media, and few checks on the presidency. The West cannot afford to let Russia descend into chaos, which might mean losing control of Russia's arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, but its two-faced NATO expansion policy hurts the democrats' chances.
Russia's interests demand good relations with everyone, but older, darker forces tempt it to avenge its fall from superpowerdom. Westernizing democrats govern for now, but ex-communist elites and embittered generals scheme to re invigorate the military and reassert control over the borderlands. Their machinations are creating a fault line across the oil-rich Caucasus and Central Asia. For Russia to neglect its reconstruction to pursue the illusion of power would be a monumental mistake. While the expansion of NATO is misconceived, the West must not encourage Russian hard-liners with unmerited concessions.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.