What Does China Think?
Westerners generally have a hard time keeping track of Chinese intellectuals -- essayists, academics, philosophers, government officials, journalists, novelists. Leonard has come up with an ingenious solution: he has drafted a dramatis personae that consists of one-paragraph introductions to China's leading thinkers -- and collectively they provide answers to the question of what China thinks. The Chinese experience with Maoism and Dengism has produced a leadership community that still attaches importance to ideological positions, but at the same time there is tolerance for a degree of diversity. Enough Chinese scholars have studied at Western universities that the culture of free-thinking academics is understood at Chinese universities.
Related
Ahmed Rashid has it wrong. The Taliban's days are, mercifully, numbered.
China is finding it ever more difficult to straddle the divide between its anachronistic political system and its booming market economy. A reconsideration of the country's political future must come soon. Fortunately, China can find guidance in its own history: a previous generation of reformers who sought to balance the imperatives of modernity with the best aspects of Chinese tradition.
Western thinkers assume that the rise of East Asian powers will inevitably result in conflict and that these nations will become more like Western societies. Neither is likely. East Asia's nations have emerged from colonial obscurity to center stage. They will not succumb to ruinous wars. The difficulty that Western minds face in grasping the ascent of East Asia comes from the unprecedented nature of this phenomenon: a fusion of Western and East Asian cultures in the Asia-pacific region.
