Appeasing Bankers: Financial Caution on the Road to War
Scholars have long debated the role of bankers and businesspeople in matters of war and peace. Some claim that states frequently go to war in search of markets and profits, whereas others see economic interests as the great constituency for peace. In this richly historical and wonderfully written book, Kirshner provides the definitive account of the policy preferences of the financial community in countries on the brink of hostilities. He finds that the financial sector -- banks, insurance companies, investment groups, exchange traders -- has an almost universal aversion to war, consistently favoring cautious national security strategies. This opposition to armed conflict is not ideological or driven by attitudes toward particular international controversies. Rather, it is the economic consequences of war -- and the palpable costs of macroeconomic instability -- that generate this orientation. Kirshner uses case studies of the Spanish-American War, interwar Japan and France, and the United States during the Cold War and draws on copious primary sources. He finds that even during the Korean War, American financiers thought that "inflation posed a greater threat to America than did Stalin." Interestingly, the study does not see a similar aversion to war on the part of international business and trading interests.
Related
A new U.S. emphasis on African maritime development -- dedicated not only to rooting out piracy but also renovating ports and investing in job creation -- could improve African security and economic growth.
Despite widespread fears about China's growing economic clout and political stature, Beijing remains committed to a "peaceful rise": bringing its people out of poverty by embracing economic globalization and improving relations with the rest of the world. As it emerges as a great power, China knows that its continued development depends on world peace -- a peace that its development will in turn reinforce.
INTRODUCTION: This year was in all respects a very heavy time," wrote the authors of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle in 1097, and we can appropriately use the same phrase to describe 1980. To be sure our country was not engaged in war; the Danes did not raid our coast; America was still rich by world standards; and the harvest was adequate. But a doleful chorus of lamentation was heard not only in our land but throughout the non-communist nations. It had a persistent recurring theme. At a time when the Soviet Union was systematically extending its military reach, the United States was falling into apathy and incompetence. No longer did we Americans seem willing and able to assure the security of our friends and allies. No longer did we display the mastery of events that had given confidence in our economic, political and military leadership.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.