The Freedom Agenda: Why America Must Spread Democracy (Just Not the Way George Bush Did)
The Bush administration's "freedom agenda" linked U.S. national security to the spread of democracy worldwide. After years of controversy and policy failure, democracy promotion is now greeted with sober skepticism. Realists are again cautioning against ideological crusades. This spirited book argues that the United States should not abandon the democracy agenda, even as it needs to radically rethink its strategy and tactics. As Traub sees it, the post-September 11 embrace of democracy promotion is now seen in the Middle East and elsewhere as a tool of hegemony and domination, pursued by a fearful superpower that has relaxed its own standards of openness and the rule of law at home.
Despite this, he argues that the new administration will need to untangle support for democracy from the war on terrorism and take steps to restore the United States' reputation as the great benign benefactor of liberal democracy. Most of the book is a fast-paced historical survey of the United States' long and conflicted record of championing liberal democracy abroad, beginning with the Philippines in 1898 and continuing with the creation of democracy in Germany and Japan and then the Cold War-era embrace of despots and democrats in Latin America, Asia, and the Middle East. According to Traub, a policy that rehabilitates the democracy agenda must begin with an end to grand theological statements about "the march of liberty" and "making freedom manifest" in popular elections and move to a quiet focus on policies that support long-term transitions to the rule of law, limited government, and the upholding of individual rights.
Related
From Washington to Baghdad, the debate over American empire is back. Five new books weigh in, some celebrating the imperial project as the last best hope of humankind, others attacking it as cause for worry. What they all fail to understand is that U.S. power is neither as great as most claim nor as dangerous as others fear.
In today's interconnected world, weak and failed states pose an acute risk to U.S. and global security. Anticipating, averting, and responding to conflict requires more planning and better organization -- precisely the missions of the State Department's new Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization.
The basic assumptions of U.S. policy toward the Gulf demand rethinking. The Pentagon pays up to $60 billion a year to protect the import of $30 billion worth of oil that would flow anyway. Playing the role of regional hegemon ties America to troubled regimes and leaves it out on a limb, while allies sit back. Washington must hedge against inevitable political change in the region by spreading the burden and the say, reversing arms proliferation, and encouraging the Gulf states to come up with some security of their own.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.