Religion and American Foreign Policy, 1945-1960: The Soul of Containment
The American academy has been rediscovering the importance of religion in politics and foreign policy; Inboden's new book makes a vital contribution to this ongoing project by examining the ways in which both politicians and religious leaders grappled with the challenges of Cold War diplomacy. Presidents Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower, in Inboden's view, instinctively grasped the global and domestic importance of casting the Cold War as a struggle between religion and atheism. This focus put them at loggerheads with important currents in American Protestantism; one of the few convictions that liberal and conservative Protestants shared in the pre-Vatican II era was a deep suspicion of the Roman Catholic Church at home and abroad. Ultimately, the politicians prevailed over the theologians; the ecumenical civilreligious culture of Eisenhower's America represented a flattening out of theological differences in the interest of a common political vision. Ranging over subjects as diverse as the missionary influence in the China lobby and the political impact of the once-formidable Moral Rearmament movement, Inboden produces a stimulating and compelling picture of American religious and political life.
Related
Sloppy execution means The Israel Lobby, however commendable the intentions of its authors, will have the opposite of its desired effect: impeding new thinking about U.S. policy in the Middle East rather than advancing the debate.
Russia's post-Soviet orientation is in serious trouble. The West does not want to see any structure in Eurasia that permits Russian hegemony, but abetting continued chaos in the former Soviet space is hardly in the West's interest. Central Asia and the Caucasus are rife with flash points that could ignite and draw in outside powers, and the presence of nuclear weapons raises the stakes even higher. The United States should support integration, not division. For its part, Russia should work with nearby countries to help unite diverse peoples in a stabler system.
The United States has failed to understand the global resurgence of religiosity. Washington should put the promotion of religious freedom at the center of U.S. foreign policy -- recognizing that it is vital not only to liberty and stability abroad but also to U.S. national security.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.