Hitler's Empire: How the Nazis Ruled Europe
The Nazis are rightly better remembered for their capacity to wage war than for their ability to consolidate peace. In this impressive work, Mazower demonstrates just how incompetent they were at the latter task. Indeed, for a party so obsessed with the virtue of order, the Nazis were surprisingly disorganized and inefficient when it came to trying to govern those whose armies they had so efficiently defeated. It was not just that the brutal tactics of mass execution (including of many of the most talented members of society), forced labor, and the inhumane treatment of local populations turned those populations against them and made governance more difficult. It was also that the Nazis do not seem even to have given much serious thought to the imperial role they were so determined to acquire. The Nazi occupation was improvised and disorganized, and it vastly underestimated the political, logistical, and demographic challenges it would face. There were not enough ethnic Germans to rule the vast conquered regions by an iron fist alone, yet the Nazis' tactics made any alternative to such rule impossible. "Germany," Mazower points out, "could have racial purity or imperial domination, but it could not have both."
Related
In the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries, when it was fashionable to speak of international problems in terms of "Questions" to be solved, the "Irish Question" proved particularly intractable for successive British governments. For Gladstone in 1886 it was "the long vexed and troubled relations between Great Britain and Ireland which exhibit to us the one and only conspicuous failure of the political genius of our race." He devoted much of his later political life to the question but his attempts to solve it were unsuccessful.
The difference between the factions in Bosnia is not morality, as the Bosnian Muslims and Western press insist, but power and opportunity. All have the same goal: to avoid living as a minority. All have committed crimes against other ethnic groups. Despite its claims of neutrality and preaching against military solutions, the United States has favored the Bosnian Muslims, keeping silent as they launched offensives from U.N.-guarded safe areas. Since air strikes cannot resolve the conflict, the United States must discourage violence by all sides and let Russia--the one country Serbs trust--take the lead in negotiations.
Responding to Charles G. Boyd on the Balkan crisis, author Noel Malcolm, professor Norman Cigar, and journalist David Rieff argue the Serbs bear the primary guilt; William E. Odom sees an opportunity that nato must seize; Boyd replies.
