Embattled Garrisons: Comparative Base Politics and American Globalism.
The United States' military dominance is built on a worldwide system of bases. This important book provides a much-needed survey of the history and politics of these "global guardians." As Calder argues, military bases on foreign soil have long been fixtures of empire, but the U.S. postwar network of forward-deployed forces is historically unique in its global reach and geopolitical role. In contrast to Chalmers Johnson's "empire of bases" thesis, Calder's argument suggests that the U.S. system of bases has generally played a stabilizing role and worked to the advantage of all parties. But the amount of political support for these far-flung security partnerships varies widely -- and Calder's chief concern is to identify the factors that generate stability and those that create conflict. Calder ends by affirming the strategic value of forward deployments and suggesting that the "Singapore model" -- in which facilities are maintained but with minimal U.S. military personnel -- may be the wave of the future.
Related
Somehow the United States has remained unchallenged despite victory. Defying the laws of realpolitik, no one is ganging up on the hegemon. Through two world wars, the United States practiced a strategy like Britain's, remaining aloof from international troubles, stepping in only to rectify the balance of power. Today the United States is more like Bismarck's Germany, developing alliances with everyone so that ganging up against it is impossible. But it will have to keep providing order and security for others. Only by doing good can it do well.
Russia's interests demand good relations with everyone, but older, darker forces tempt it to avenge its fall from superpowerdom. Westernizing democrats govern for now, but ex-communist elites and embittered generals scheme to re invigorate the military and reassert control over the borderlands. Their machinations are creating a fault line across the oil-rich Caucasus and Central Asia. For Russia to neglect its reconstruction to pursue the illusion of power would be a monumental mistake. While the expansion of NATO is misconceived, the West must not encourage Russian hard-liners with unmerited concessions.
With exclusive access to newly opened Soviet records, Aleksandr Fursenko and Timothy Naftali reveal that Kennedy blinked too soon and Khrushchev declared victory.
