Where Have All the Soldiers Gone? The Transformation of Modern Europe
This gem of a book is the story of the battle between pacifism and militarism in Europe over the past century -- and the story of how pacifism won. At the start of the twentieth century, pacifism and militarism "existed side by side" in Europe. Influential writers, such as Ivan Bloch and Norman Angell, argued that modern technology had made warfare so potentially violent that it could not possibly make sense any longer, while their critics, such as the German military historian Hans Delbrück and the American strategist Alfred Thayer Mahan, insisted that war could still be necessary, just, and even glorious. The unprecedented destruction of two world wars catastrophically illustrated Bloch's and Angell's point -- the first leaving a majority of Europeans determined "never again" to wage war, the second driving that message home to the entire continent. Postwar Europeans, after two generations of fratricide, focused on building "civilian states," a posture made possible by the U.S. nuclear umbrella. Still today, Sheehan reports, despite the end of the Cold War and fitful efforts to develop the European Union's defense capabilities, European military budgets continue to fall and Europe's citizens reject military force as a tool of national policy. The sources of Europe's antimilitarism have been examined by other scholars, but Sheehan's vivid historical narrative adds value by giving the reader a real feeling for how their experience with warfare as an allegedly rational policy tool led Europeans to abandon it. This book is a model for how good history can be used to explain the present.
Related
In "Saving NATO From Europe," (November/December 2004), Jeffrey L. Cimbalo warns that a dagger is pointed at the heart of the Atlantic alliance, and the murder weapon is the European Union's draft constitution. Ratification of that document, Cimbalo asserts, would have "profound and troubling implications for the transatlantic alliance and for future U.S. influence in Europe." Washington, he believes, should "end its uncritical support for European integration" and work with its friends in Europe to halt the EU process and save NATO from an untimely death.
In Germany as in France, 1969 will be remembered as the year of the break in continuity. The principal break is in each case obvious: the departure of General de Gaulle after eleven years in power and the relegation of the Christian Democrats to the opposition after twenty years in power. But the nature and import of these breaks call for interpretation.
Despite the recent waves of tourists who have returned with tales of the beauties and comforts of Lisbon and Estoril, and despite new Luso-American cultural and commercial links, misunderstanding and ignorance characterize much American thought about Portugal. Some observers still believe that this small nation lives entirely in the past. But the fact is that significant changes are taking place there.
