Fixing Fragile States: A New Paradigm for Development
Economic development around the world has proceeded further than analysts half a century ago dared to hope. But development has not been universal, and the hardest cases -- states that lack social cohesion or are "fragile" -- remain underdeveloped. Conventional approaches to spurring development, through foreign aid, technical assistance, or exhortation by Western governments and nongovernmental organizations, have obviously failed in such places, where Western notions of a competently governed, democratic central state have often not taken hold. Kaplan, a business consultant, here reviews the reasons for these failures and offers ten guiding principles for altering conventional approaches to development, largely through much greater formal recognition of diverse cultural, linguistic, and tribal identities within state boundaries and through building both loyalty and accountability at the local level. He then offers suggestions based on these principles for dealing with seven difficult cases, each of which presents distinctive challenges and opportunities: western Africa, where a regional approach is espoused, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Syria, Somaliland (Somalia as a whole is abandoned), Bolivia, Pakistan, and Azerbaijan. This is a stimulating contribution to a growing literature on how to deal with fragile states.
Related
Three issues preoccupy Asia's leaders (1) economic strategy (2) political stability versus greater openness (3) regionalism. The accelerating socio-economic revolution presents challenges to both the Marxist and the democratic states. There is a requirement for increased public participation, greater local autonomy and more regional and international interaction. On balance the odds favouring a largely peaceful revolution are lengthening.
The substantive and procedural problems of Latin American development are hard enough. Harder still is the inseparable task of understanding the social and psychological problems well enough to begin coping with them. With Latin America, we do not have any significant difficulties in formulating goals. The 1961 Charter of Punta del Este, the lines of action agreed on by the Presidents at Punta del Este in 1967, the economic and social principles of the revised Charter of the Organization of American States-indeed the constitutions of the other American states-all support this assertion. The difficulties begin thereafter, when operations start to go forward. The problems are various, and their origins are distributed. Most of the impediments that are fairly attributable to the United States arise from that short-haul practicality all too often, and incorrectly, called "pragmatism."
Why has the developing world become poorer as the industrialized nations have grown richer? Robust growth depends on a strong state that can enforce laws, yet many impoverished countries lack effective governance. And by strictly limiting immigration, rich countries deny the world's poor a chance to vote with their feet.
