Prophesies of Godlessness: Predictions of America's Imminent Secularization From the Puritans to the Present Day
Under the brilliant editorship of Mathewes and Nichols, this chronologically arranged and thematically linked collection of essays looks at a tradition that extends from Puritan jeremiads to modern-day prophecies of doom, resulting an illuminating tour of American intellectual history that startles, provokes, and engages.
Sometimes hopefully, sometimes in despair, Americans have been predicting the imminent disappearance of religion in the United States since colonial times. Jonathan Edwards worried that orthodox Protestantism was about to disappear from the United States; Thomas Jefferson and Ralph Waldo Emerson hoped he was right. From generation to generation, the prophecies have been wrong; from generation to generation, they have been renewed. Under the brilliant editorship of Mathewes and Nichols, this chronologically arranged and thematically linked collection of essays looks at a tradition that extends from Puritan jeremiads to modern-day prophecies of doom. The result is an illuminating tour of American intellectual history that startles, provokes, and engages. It does not, however, tell us whether American religion is doomed -- whether the Puritans or the secularists will triumph in the end. It does suggest that the interplay among the Puritan heritage of Calvinist New England, Enlightenment rationalism, the individualism of American culture, and the spiritual seeking that has characterized both evangelical revivals and the more heterodox odysseys of figures such as Walt Whitman will continue to keep the pot of American spiritual striving on the boil -- and keep prophets of godlessness gainfully employed.
Related
The decade of the sixties has produced a new school of isolationism. The reaction to the war in Vietnam, the demands of domestic problems and the seeming hollowness of traditional assumptions of international involvement- all give rise to this outlook. The isolationism is sometimes incoherent, occasionally inconsistent, and very attractive to a large portion of the younger generation.
Author's Note: This article summarizes a section by S. M. Lipset in "They Would Rather Be Left," by S. M. Lipset and Gerald Schaflander, to be published next fall by Little, Brown.
To see ourselves as others see us is a rare and valuable gift, without a doubt. But in international relations what is still rarer and far more useful is to see others as they see themselves. The two talents, the double giftie, would, if generalized, abort many preconceptions that delay or obstruct agreement, and would also reduce that sterile indignation on which the newspaper-nurtured peoples feed. It is indeed extraordinary how little the power to spread news and opinion around the globe in a few seconds affects the judgments that one nation passes on another which is accessible and "well-known." Travel itself, which is now so frequent as to seem a childish indulgence without excuse, leaves the casual and the trained observers equally at fault. Everybody responds as if involved in a social encounter. Thus de Gaulle remains puzzling or is deemed perverse because his foreign critics do not see the French as they happen to see themselves today-rehashing the causes of defeat and loss of empire and needing to stiffen their morale with an exacting ideal of greatness in a period of relaxing prosperity. Again, the American experts visiting Britain in hopes of aiding the increase of her industrial output do not see that the resistance to modernizing springs from the intuition that the new methods must destroy the quiet restraint and wordless adjustment between persons and classes which the English know to be their strength as a people.
