Southern Storm: Sherman's March to the Sea
Trudeau brings an encyclopedic knowledge of the copious controversial literature on this subject to this book and takes readers in Sherman's footsteps on a day-by-day account of the march, using journals, newspapers, and other sources to re-create everything from the weather to the conflicting guesses among the Confederates and the Yankees about where, exactly, Sherman was headed.
Union General William Tecumseh Sherman's march through Georgia from Atlanta to Savannah was perhaps the most dramatic military episode of the American Civil War, and it left an indelible mark on the American historical memory. Trudeau brings an encyclopedic knowledge of the copious controversial literature on this subject to this book and takes readers in Sherman's footsteps on a day-by-day account of the march, using journals, newspapers, and other sources to re-create everything from the weather to the conflicting guesses among the Confederates and the Yankees about where, exactly, Sherman was headed. At times, the day-by-day approach is frustrating, as a thicket of details seems to obscure the overall narrative line. However, over time, Trudeau's painstaking technique succeeds in creating an unforgettable picture of the march. By the fall of 1864, the South was in a state of political and strategic collapse. Fire-eating Confederate newspaper editors issued calls for the population to rise up and resist, and Jefferson Davis, the Confederate president, dispatched a bevy of generals to face the invader, but the South was losing its will and its ability to fight on. Sherman's march exposed the futility of the Confederate cause while sharply reminding Southerners that the cost of continued resistance was likely to grow. Although the March to the Sea increased the bitterness of the war, and contributed significantly to Southern resentment in generations to come, it had decisive consequences in bringing the conflict to a close. This unconventional narrative is ultimately a very satisfying read.
Related
THE United States has now signed four major treaties with Pacific nations. One of these is the Treaty of Peace between 48 Allied Powers and Japan. The other three are security treaties, one with the Philippines, another with Australia and New Zealand and the third with Japan.
EVERY country's international thinking is profoundly affected and perhaps finally shaped by its own history, particularly its experience in time of war. The United States itself provides an admirable example. The First World War ultimately engaged American forces on the grand scale; and those forces played a great part in the getting of victory. It was, paradoxically, American leadership which did so much to create what turned out to be a non-American League of Nations. But, the war over, isolationism once more grew and prospered in the United States.
WAR is positive, peace is negative. Therefore it is natural for nations that want war to take the initiative, laying their plans far ahead and choosing the favorable moment to strike; while pacific peoples, from the very fact that they are not seeking a change, incline to rest in peace until some aggressor attacks them, and then defend themselves at a disadvantage because less well prepared beforehand. In short, the aggressive and the pacific peoples occupy the position of the wise and the foolish virgins.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.