The Foundations of Ethnic Politics: Separatism of States and Nations in Eurasia and the World
Hale disputes the notion that ethnicity generates conflict or, in fact, causes anything. He also questions the value of defining ethnicity as the two dominant schools do -- as either primordial or socially constructed.
Hale disputes the notion that ethnicity generates conflict or, in fact, causes anything. He also questions the value of defining ethnicity as the two dominant schools do -- as either primordial or socially constructed. Instead, he proposes, based on recent psychological research, that ethnicity is better understood as a prism through which people make sense of their social world. When ethnicity is activated -- say, in pursuit of separatism -- it is interest-driven, not identity-driven. Taking this view makes some puzzles disappear: Why, for example, did Ukraine, where ethnic factors predicted less inclination toward secession from the Soviet Union, and Uzbekistan, where they predicted more, each do the opposite of what was expected? Ethnicity matters mostly as a fillip to more direct impulses, an argument Hale pursues in an ambitious, painstaking quantitative and qualitative historical comparison of 45 ethnic regions in the Soviet Union. He finds that the relative strength of the economic stakes an ethnic region had in the union (poorer regions had greater stakes) explains better than other factors, including national consciousness, the push toward separatism. This simple proposition emerges from a complex, multilevel analytic framework.
Related
The ruckus over the election of a religious conservative as Turkey's president has exposed the illiberal nature of Turkish secularism -- as well as the pragmatism of the country's reformed Islamists. Preserving democracy in Turkey by keeping the military out of politics will be a tall order, but the future of the Muslim world's most promising democratic experiment is at stake.
America now faces the prospect of economic conflicts with both Europe and East Asia. The United States and the European Union have already fired the first shots of retaliatory sanctions over their ever-growing trade disputes. On the other side of the world, meanwhile, Asian countries are creating a bloc of their own that could include preferential trade arrangements and an Asian Monetary Fund. These developments could produce a tripolar world and hamper global economic integration. To avert this outcome, the United States must quell its domestic backlash against globalization and reassert its economic leadership in the world. The new Bush administration should make multilateral trade liberalization a top priority -- or it will face unpleasant economic and political consequences as the U.S. and foreign economies slow.
America's economy is in its eighth year of sustained growth, transcending the German and Japanese "miracles." This is no fluke. America's unique brand of entrepreneurial capitalism is based on a series of advantages that explain the stunning success of the 1990s and provide the basis for extending this winning streak. These strengths include deft managers, technological innovation, and a culture that values rugged individualism -- all fueled by finance capital that can nimbly meet the needs of a globalized, rapidly changing economy. Furthermore, the era of the deficit is over. Pessimists who warn of inflation should be ignored; American business leaders understand that today's low level of inflation is self-perpetuating. America's prosperity is structural, not transient, and its lead over Europe and Asia will only widen with time. America had the twentieth century. It will also have the twenty-first.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.