ARTHUR BULLARD, Director of the American Government's Public Information Service in Russia during the war, Chief of the Russian Division, Department of State, 1919-1921.
RECENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS IN RUSSIA. BY K. LEITES. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1922.
THE INDUSTRIAL REVIVAL IN SOVIET RUSSIA. BY A. A. HELLER. New York: Thomas Seltzer, 1922.
THE BALANCE SHEET OF SOVIETISM. BY BORIS LEE BRASOL. New York: Duffield & Company, 1922.
CROSS CURRENTS IN EUROPE TODAY. BY CHARLES A. BEARD. Boston: Marshall Jones Company, 1922.
RUSSLAND UND DEUTSCHLAND DURCH NOT ZUR EINIGUNG (Germany and Russia--Union Through Necessity). BY JOHANN KOLSHORN. Leipzig: 1922.
EVENTS move faster than editions. Almost every book about Russia is out of date before it is off the press. Even using the word "recent" in the title, as Mr. Leites does in his book "Recent Economic Developments in Russia," does not save the situation, for the most "recent" essay in his collection is called "Economic Life in Soviet Russia in 1920." "The Industrial Revival in Soviet Russia," by Heller, comes somewhat nearer actuality, but Mr. Heller is an apologist rather than an economic student. Some of his statements are sufficiently startling to rouse a wholesome skepticism. He has obviously looked for the best that could be said about conditions in Russia and has said them with an emphasis that obliterates perspective. An antidote--not mildly homeopathic, but strenuously allopathic--is Boris Brasol's "The Balance Sheet of Sovietism." It is so very vehement in its rage against the revolution that it is hardly worth reading, unless one wishes to understand the viewpoint of the worst of the old aristocracy and wishes to gain some appreciation of the intensity of the hatred which has overwhelmed them. Of altogether greater value for an understanding of the Russian drama are the chapters on Russia in Charles A. Beard's "Cross Currents in Europe Today." There is no up to the minute news nor personal reminiscence in these lectures of Dr. Beard's, but they are remarkable summaries of the available evidence in regard to present tendencies...
This is a premium article
You must be a logged in Foreign Affairs subscriber to continue reading. If you wish to continue reading this article please subscribe , or activate your online account to get full online access.
Log In
Buy PDF
Buy a premium PDF reprint of this article.Related
IRONICALLY enough the capitalist countries have obligingly tobogganed into the depths of the depression just in time to give the Bolsheviks a breathing spell when they need it most -- to consolidate their gains in a period of slackened tempo, to arouse fresh enthusiasm among the industrial troops by giving more attention to human needs, and to hasten the training of personnel for the plant already constructed.
THE Soviet Five Year Plan of national development (shortened in practice to a four-and-a-quarter year plan) came to an end December 31, 1932. In retrospect we see that the adoption of this gigantic blue print for the regulation of every branch of social, economic and educational activity was one of the three most important dates in the history of the Russian revolution, the other two being the Bolshevik revolution itself on November 7, 1917, and the acceptance of Lenin's New Economic Policy in March 1921.
Is an East-West policy necessary, and what should it be? Such a question would seem to go without saying and, in the eyes of countless academics and other observers, requires an affirmative response. More vigorously than ever, they are demanding from their governments, and, above all, from the United States, a "clear," "coherent," and "global" East-West policy. The question will become still more pressing in 1983, which will see the playing out of one of the most difficult matches in the game of nuclear arms negotiations since the beginning of the cold war, after the close of a year marked by two major events. In Moscow, the death of Leonid Brezhnev and the rise to power of Yuri Andropov may offer an opportunity for a new approach to old problems, and open up new perspectives on Soviet behavior. In Washington, in 1982, we have seen Ronald Reagan's policies run into their first serious problems in two areas that are supposed to be the main pillars of his "doctrine" regarding the Soviet Union: the philosophy of trade with the communist nations and the rearmament program.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.