The Disintegration of Social Classes in Russia
VICTOR CHERNOV, Russian Social-Revolutionary writer, Minister of Agriculture in the Kerensky Government, now in exile in Berlin
MORE than six years have elapsed since the downfall of the autocratic régime in Russia. Many changes have since taken place in Russian life, not only external changes in constitution and legislation, but also internal ones in the class and social structure of the Russian community.
Under the autocracy the dominant and directing rôle belonged to three basic social strata: the nobility, the wealthy bourgeoisie, and the bureaucracy.
The nobility counted as the ranking class, and the tsars liked to say: "I myself am the first nobleman of the Russian Empire." Through the process of history this class had come into possession of enormous wealth in land--about one-third of the whole area under cultivation. But the nobility were not an entirely homogeneous group, either from an economic or from a politicocultural point of view. This was the case because alongside of the noble aristocracy, who were for the most part titled and in possession of large estates, there was a nobility of owners of medium sized and small estates running down to the freeholders (owners of a single farm) who could hardly be distinguished from the ordinary peasants. There was also another kind of stratification representing the modern spirit. For some time there had been an increasing group of the nobility who were trying to modernize their agricultural methods by introducing improved machinery, rotation of crops, fertilizers, industrial farming, cattle and horse breeding, etc. This section of the nobility had progressive, liberal and at times even democratic and populistic tendencies. And this was by no means solely because they were better educated and more cultured than the old-style gentry--the "buffaloes," as they were nicknamed later when, having organized and come out into the political arena, they surprised everybody by their antediluvian views...
This is a premium article
You must be a logged in Foreign Affairs subscriber to continue reading. If you wish to continue reading this article please subscribe , or activate your online account to get full online access.
Log In
Buy PDF
Buy a premium PDF reprint of this article.Related
A GENERAL census of the population of Russia, the second in the history of the country and the first under the Soviet régime, was carried out in the last half of December, 1926, except in certain remote regions in Siberia and Central Asia, for which a longer period was required. The only previous general census was that of 1897.[i] The recent census was conducted on a very elaborate scale; 150,000 enumerators were employed, and it is estimated that 4,500 people will be engaged for the next two and one half years in tabulating the returns.
THE question of the size of the postwar population of the Soviet Union is not the least of the enigmas which have been baffling students of Russian affairs. Hardly any estimate or evaluation of an economic, sociological or military character for the U.S.S.R. can be made meaningful without an accurate knowledge of the demographic base.
Reviews recent US public opinion poll evidence on relations with USSR and security issues, finding a cautious attitude, stressing verification and other means of testing Soviet 'good faith'. Americans believe that (1) Gorbachev seeks "to change... the very character of the Soviet Union" (2) the nuclear threat from a (hypothetical) terrorist group or Third World power is greater than that from the USSR (3) today's greatest challenges (including pollution, terrorism, over-population and trade) "are no longer East-West in nature but global".

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.