COUNT HUGO LERCHENFELD, former Prime Minister of Bavaria, now a Member of the Committee for Foreign Affairs of the German Reichstag
POLITICAL history is not a sequence of incoherent and haphazard events but a chain of causes and effects. A single individual may decide from one day to the next to alter the whole course and character of his existence, to close one chapter and begin another entirely different in tone and construction. Nations cannot. They are subject to the laws of evolution, for even a revolution is generally only evolution--an explosive sequence of events crowded into a short space of time, but leaving more of the ancien régime untouched than usually is at first apparent.
When the Dawes Report was published it was almost universally acclaimed as the opening of a new era. It was to solve all problems, financial and economic, and to bring back peace and prosperity to the world. Certainly the welcome accorded to it showed clearly how deep was the world-wide longing for a settlement.
Valuable as was the Report, its paramount importance was due to the fact that for the first time since the armistice an official conference dealing with reparations was able to put the whole problem on a business basis, and to eliminate all political elements and all illusions as to Germany's capacity to pay unlimited sums. The path indicated by the experts is certainly stony and fraught with danger, but it seems the only way out of a situation which has become more and more intolerable since the days of Versailles. Europe cannot recover as long as large districts like Germany and Russia remain outside the pale of normal international intercourse.
"Finally convinced, as we are, that it is hopeless to build any constructive scheme unless this finds its own guarantee in the fact that it is to the interest of all parties to carry it out in good faith, we put forward our plan, relying upon this interest." This extract from the Dawes Report lays stress upon the two elements essential to success: common-sense and moral responsibility.
Much has been said and written about the Report, often without a very thorough knowledge of its contents and of the underlying situation. It may, therefore, be useful briefly to recapitulate the problems which it is designed to solve...
This is a premium article
You must be a logged in Foreign Affairs subscriber to continue reading. If you wish to continue reading this article please subscribe , or activate your online account to get full online access.
Log In
Buy PDF
Buy a premium PDF reprint of this article.Related
For five years between 1925 and 1929, a certain portion of mankind, like those parched travelers in the desert who think they have glimpsed the oasis which will save them, believed the gate to lasting peace was at hand. This, as we now know, was only a mirage. But such a mirage had never before existed. People had never believed so fervently in the blessings of peace, or hoped so passionately that peace would be perpetual. Optimism rose to new heights. "Away with cannon and machineguns: instead, conciliation, arbitration, and peace!" At the meeting of the League of Nations on September 10, 1926, when Germany, recently defeated, was received as a member, the French Foreign Minister Aristide Briand touched a new intensity of emotion with these celebrated words.
ON the east side of the circle of statues to French cities that bounds the Place de la Concorde, the female figure representing Strasbourg, capital of Alsace-Lorraine, for many years sat draped in mourning, a constant reminder to a symbol-loving nation of an historical event which President Wilson in his Fourteen Points was to describe as "the wrong done to France in 1871." That wrong having been righted by the agreement by which Germany laid down her arms on November 22, 1918, the French army marched over the Vosges, to be greeted at every village by an outburst of collective emo
In Germany as in France, 1969 will be remembered as the year of the break in continuity. The principal break is in each case obvious: the departure of General de Gaulle after eleven years in power and the relegation of the Christian Democrats to the opposition after twenty years in power. But the nature and import of these breaks call for interpretation.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.