Oil, Great Britain and the United States
ARTHUR C. VEATCH, geologist of the United States Geological Survey, 1906-10; petroleum geologist and technologist with S. Pearson and Son, Ltd., 1913-19, and with the Sinclair Consolidated Oil Corporation, 1919-28
WHATEVER may have been the causes for friction in the past between the American and British Governments growing out of competition for control of petroleum supplies -- and I shall endeavor to trace and illustrate some of the factors involved -- these have been temporarily swept away by the realization that the world resources of petroleum are really very large. Even the most skeptical have been forced to take account of the fact that at the present time there is more petroleum being produced in the world than the oil companies know what to do with, and that the additional supply in sight and subject to quick production is so large that the problem of the moment is not "Where can we get petroleum?" but "How can we dispose of what we have at a profit?" Thus, instead of a competition for the control of oil supplies involving aims or actions productive of international friction, we are dealing at present with the more simple matter of competition for the disposal of a commodity of which for the time being there is an oversupply.
For many years there has been a popular belief in the United States that the petroleum resources of this country were being depleted to meet the world's needs for oil, and this led to the growth of a view that vital national interests (as distinct from national interests in normal business competition) required that foreign sources of supply be developed and controlled. But today both foreign and American petroleum deposits have been so extensively and successfully developed that there is a growing demand for a protective duty on foreign petroleum and petroleum products imported into the United States. This involves possibilities of international friction of a different character in which the issues are not primarily between the United States and Great Britain...
This is a premium article
You must be a logged in Foreign Affairs subscriber to continue reading. If you wish to continue reading this article please subscribe , or activate your online account to get full online access.
Log In
Buy PDF
Buy a premium PDF reprint of this article.Related
The United States recently "discovered" Mexico. Potential oil reserves of 200 billion barrels helped focus our attention and sparked interest in forging some kind of special relationship with our southern neighbor. Concrete proposals range from a North American Accord or Common Market to less dramatic package deals that would swap petroleum for increased Mexican access to U.S. markets.
Oil stocks can help buffer economic shocks, but only if Washington radically reforms its handling of them.
Alaskan politicians have used every oil-price rise since 1973 to push for drilling beneath the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. But even putting environmental questions aside, refuge oil is unnecessary, insecure, economically risky, and a distraction from the real energy debate. Market solutions that enhance efficiency can provide secure, safe, and clean energy services at much lower cost.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.