Japan's Railway Control in Manchuria

The above railway map shows the situation which has developed in Manchuria since Japan occupied the country and later set up the government of Manchukuo. Japan's purposes are revealed as twofold: one, to open up the country and tie it closely to Japan; two, to provide security for the new state of Manchukuo against outside attack, at the same time, perhaps, laying a basis for a counter-offensive through Manchuria in case of Russo-Japanese hostilities.
The line from the new capital of Hsinching to the Korean port of Yuki has been completed since the Japanese occupation of Manchuria in 1931. It greatly shortens the route to northern Japan; the haul from Hsinching to Osaka is reduced by 460 miles.
Three lines are now under construction: Peipiao-Jehol, Taoan-Solun and Lafa-Harbin. The latter parallels the southern branch of the Chinese Eastern and might be given up if the Russians sell their lines to Manchukuo. Several other lines are projected, all of strategic importance. Three (Solun-Manchouli, Hailun-Heiho, and that from the Muling Colliery to the Ussuri River) would cut the Trans-Siberian at strategic points. The line Peipiao-Hsifeng would open a way into Mongolia...
This is a premium article
You must be a logged in Foreign Affairs subscriber to continue reading. If you wish to continue reading this article please subscribe , or activate your online account to get full online access.
Log In
Buy PDF
Buy a premium PDF reprint of this article.Related
IN presenting an unbiased picture of Japan's attitude towards China certain general conclusions may be set forth at the beginning. First, Japan has definitely renounced aggressive or imperialistic designs such as were apparent in her attitude between, say, 1915 and 1919.
China's policy of aggression and coercion in the seas of the western Pacific long predates the high-profile incidents of recent weeks. If Washington hopes to counter Beijing's creeping power in the region, it will have to be firm and proactive in demonstrating its resolve.
The Clinton administration inherits strained bilateral relations with the leading powers of Asia and no coherent policy for the Asia/Pacific region as a whole. Trade, security and diplomatic style are the overarching challenges--and on all three counts prominent Asians are worried. They fear a president bent on building trade walls, bringing home American troops and lecturing on human rights. Yet respect for the United States remains instinctive throughout the region, particularly given convincing progress in rejuvenating the American economy. Asia's quest for economic growth and more democratic government awaits leadership from Washington.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.