PHILIP E. MOSELY, Director of Studies, Council on Foreign Relations; former Director of Russian Institute, Columbia University; officer in the Department of State, 1942-46; Adviser to the United States Delegation, Council of Foreign Ministers, London and Paris, 1945-46
MANY of the American tourists who are pouring into the Soviet Union this year are surprised by the evidences on every hand of economic vigor and large-scale construction. "From our papers," said one, "I thought everything would be in a mess. Things look pretty good here; they have built a lot." Another tourist: "People are very free here. I took as many pictures as I wanted in the Kremlin and no one stopped me."
The new rulers are obviously gaining credit with the people at large through making one minor adjustment or accommodation after another. Many Soviet people commented favorably to me on the shortening of the sixth day of work, on Saturdays and on the eve of holidays, from eight to six hours. "This will be a great help in my weekly shopping." Many individuals mentioned this change with pleasure and then asked whether people in the United States work six or eight hours on Saturday. They were amazed to learn of the normal five-day work-week in America and in many other Western countries.
Much satisfaction was expressed over the recent restoration of free tuition for students in high schools and universities, a reversion to the pre-1940 arrangement. Since education is the major channel for social advancement, this is an especially welcome improvement. Again, no one I spoke with had any realization that in the United States tuition in high schools has long been free and also includes free books and school supplies. On the other hand, the multifarious system of free, partly free and paid tuition and scholarships in our colleges and universities was much too complicated for most listeners to grasp...
This is a premium article
You must be a logged in Foreign Affairs subscriber to continue reading. If you wish to continue reading this article please subscribe , or activate your online account to get full online access.
Log In
Buy PDF
Buy a premium PDF reprint of this article.Related
During the Party Congress, which met in the new Kremlin theater from October 17 through October 31, the attention of the world was divided almost equally between the vivid and almost daily attacks on the "antiparty group" of Khrushchev's repentant and unrepentant rivals and the clear if somewhat muffled Sino-Soviet divergences over revolutionary strategy. The first of these "sensations" was obviously orchestrated in advance, and each spokesman for the central leadership was assigned a larger or smaller dose of "revelations" to pepper up the otherwise somewhat routine speeches. The second, which came to a head early on in a dispute over the future treatment of the recalcitrant Albanian Party, was clearly unplanned, and it has left a wide-open field for speculation about its implications for the future.
RECENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS IN RUSSIA. BY K. LEITES. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1922.
THE INDUSTRIAL REVIVAL IN SOVIET RUSSIA. BY A. A. HELLER. New York: Thomas Seltzer, 1922.
THE BALANCE SHEET OF SOVIETISM. BY BORIS LEE BRASOL. New York: Duffield & Company, 1922.
CROSS CURRENTS IN EUROPE TODAY. BY CHARLES A. BEARD. Boston: Marshall Jones Company, 1922.
RUSSLAND UND DEUTSCHLAND DURCH NOT ZUR EINIGUNG (Germany and Russia--Union Through Necessity). BY JOHANN KOLSHORN. Leipzig: 1922.
Will Russia be run by democrats or oligarchs? The signs are worrying. The West would rather not dwell on the extent to which Russia's market is dominated by robber barons and permeated by crime and corruption. Russia's democracy is weak, with unfair election campaigns, a compromised media, and few checks on the presidency. The West cannot afford to let Russia descend into chaos, which might mean losing control of Russia's arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, but its two-faced NATO expansion policy hurts the democrats' chances.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.