SIR GEORGE THOMSON, Master of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge; Chairman, Scientific Advisory Council, Ministry of Fuel and Power; Chairman of the first British Committee on Atomic Energy, 1940-41; Professor of Physics, Imperial College of Science, 1930-52; winner of Nobel Prize for Physics, 1937; author of many scientific works
ENERGY is one of the fundamental concepts of the physicist--perhaps the fundamental concept. Power, which is the rate at which energy is supplied, is almost equally important to the statesman. In the modern world, power is a need hardly less vital than food and water.
A nation's per capita consumption of energy is a very good indication of its economic standing. Strictly speaking, consumption is the wrong word, for energy cannot be consumed, it can only be transformed. But it is often changed from a readily available form to one which is useless, as when the power supplied to the engines of an airplane is transformed, as it all ultimately is, into heating the air through which the plane flies. This illustrates an important feature of the use of energy. In most cases (though there are exceptions), what men want is not actually energy but some change which occurs as a kind of by-product of its transformation; in the case of an airplane this is the rapid carriage of people or goods from one place to another. For this reason it is difficult to say categorically just how much power a nation must have at its disposal to achieve a particular standard of living. One can use power wisely or wastefully. While the amount of food necessary to live in health is measurable, one can hardly say the same for power.
However, the history of the last century shows a steady increase in per capita power for the leading nations and there is good reason to suppose that this increase will continue at a rate close to 3 percent per annum.[i] Any country which cannot achieve this increase must expect to be severely pinched, to have its development retarded, and probably to face a declining standard of living...
This is a premium article
You must be a logged in Foreign Affairs subscriber to continue reading. If you wish to continue reading this article please subscribe , or activate your online account to get full online access.
Log In
Buy PDF
Buy a premium PDF reprint of this article.Related
WHATEVER may have been the causes for friction in the past between the American and British Governments growing out of competition for control of petroleum supplies -- and I shall endeavor to trace and illustrate some of the factors involved -- these have been temporarily swept away by the realization that the world resources of petroleum are really very large.
Robert and Isabelle Tombs' superb chronicle of 300 years of Anglo-French rivalry reveals how the love-hate relationship between France and the United Kingdom has left an indelible mark on today's world.
The Atlantic nations are moving toward a new security relationship which may in time involve the role of European strategic nuclear forces. We are in a period of widespread questioning of the nature of future American participation in the defense of Western Europe. In the squalor of American cities, the increased racial and social tensions of our society and the demands for a shift in national priorities away from defense toward domestic problems lie the seeds of change. If we add to these the economic recovery of Europe, the U.S. view that the allies are not carrying a fair share of their own defense, the balance-of-payments deficit toward which the U.S. forces abroad make a substantial contribution, the squeeze on the Pentagon budget, the tendency resulting from the traumatic experience in Vietnam to shed responsibilities, we find the ingredients of a reduced U.S. military involvement in Europe.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.