ROBERT B. ANDERSON, Secretary of the Treasury of the United States; Secretary of the Navy, 1953-54; Deputy Secretary of Defense, 1954-55
IT IS a new thing for Americans to be concerned with our balance of payments. We are accustomed to thinking of ourselves as a nation with almost limitless productive resources--a nation capable of turning out goods and services sufficient for our own needs and for a sizable foreign demand, without undue monetary strain. After all, didn't World War II demonstrate that the United States, with a very small proportion of the world's population, could produce much of the material needed to win a world war, maintain high living standards at home, and afterwards provide an unprecedented amount of assistance to war-torn countries elsewhere?
All this is true. But time moves swiftly.
Our resources did in fact make it possible for us to act quickly after World War II in easing the "balance of payments" problems of others. The destruction and economic dislocation of the war had wiped out much of Western Europe's monetary reserves. Export earnings had greatly diminished. The United States recognized that the war-devastated countries had little ability to pay for imports of food, materials and equipment--the foundations on which swift and effective rehabilitation had to be built.
It was clear that capital was required in the underdeveloped areas of the world also. During the war and afterwards, people in many formerly isolated areas were brought into abrupt contact with both the institutions and the advanced technology of the West. Not only were old customs and allegiances weakened; there was an urge, stronger than any ties with the past, to achieve the conditions making for improved standards of living. For this, too, capital was needed.
It was against this background of rehabilitation needs in Western Europe and the thrust toward economic advancement elsewhere that the United States supported the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the International Monetary Fund, devised the Greek-Turkey aid program and the European Recovery Program, and has continued during the postwar period to participate actively in broad programs of aid and foreign loans. As a result of all of these efforts the balance of payments problems of many countries have been reduced to manageable proportions; indeed, in some cases, they have been eliminated. What is new in our present situation is the realization that we now have a balance of payments problem of our own...
This is a premium article
You must be a logged in Foreign Affairs subscriber to continue reading. If you wish to continue reading this article please subscribe , or activate your online account to get full online access.
Log In
Buy PDF
Buy a premium PDF reprint of this article.Related
Politicians in Washington are clamoring for currency revaluation in China to reverse China's trade surplus with the United States. But the trade imbalance is not the threat they make it out to be, and a stronger yuan is not the solution. Everybody should focus instead on properly integrating China into the global economy.
Almost exactly five years after the first oil shock, the second began. The parts of the puzzle are arranged quite differently this time around, but the two central pieces are the same. The upheaval in Iran has meant an interruption of supply and a loss to world production already as great as that from the 1973 embargo; the tight world oil market which had been predicted, just last fall, only for the mid-1980s or beyond is already upon us. And, as a direct result, the OPEC countries-which in December 1978 had already announced a substantial price rise during 1979-are further increasing prices.
Our Money, Our Debt, Our Problem
Brad Setser and Nouriel Roubini

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.