Gideon Rose

Postscript
Daniel Byman, Kenneth Pollack, and Gideon Rose

A postscript by the authors to their January/February 1999 essay "The Rollback Fantasy."

Review Essay
Mar/Apr
1999
Gideon Rose

A raft of new books confronts a very real threat-the terrorist use of weapons of mass destruction-and propose vital, though moderate, responses.

Essay
Jan/Feb
1999
Daniel Byman, Kenneth Pollack, and Gideon Rose

The hottest foreign policy idea in Washington today is using the Iraqi opposition to topple Saddam Hussein. But all the current rollback plans are militarily ludicrous, anathema to key U.S. allies, or unacceptable to the American public. Relying on airpower would require a Desert Storm-sized air war and even then would probably flop; seizing enclaves from Saddam's grasp asks far too much of the feeble opposition army; and none of Iraq's neighbors will host guerrillas out to oust Saddam. Rollback's advocates are indulging in either wishful thinking or cynical politics. The only real option is renewed containment to keep Iraq in its box. Delusions of grandeur about toppling Saddam will lead only to another Bay of Pigs.

Essay
Jan/Feb
1998
Gideon Rose

Despite disagreements over troops in Bosnia, all sides want an exit strategy. That concept, however, dating back only to the ignominious U.S. withdrawal from Somalia, has nothing to do with military requirements and everything to do with post-Cold War politics. Exit strategies harm a mission's chances of success, and had they been required the United States would not have defended the armistice after the Korean War, kept the peace on the Sinai Peninsula after Camp David, or undertaken NATO. The real question is not when American troops will be out, but why they are going in.