Foreign Affairs LIVE: "Occupy Wall Street" & Economic Inequality
A conversation with George Packer, Robert C. Lieberman, and Gary Clyde Hufbauer.
Like an odorless gas, economic inequality pervades every corner of the United States and saps the strength of its democracy. Over the past three decades, Washington has consistently favored the rich -- and the more wealth accumulates in a few hands at the top, the more influence and favor the rich acquire, making it easier for them and their political allies to cast off restraint without paying a social price.
Increasing inequality in the United States has long been attributed to unstoppable market forces. In fact, as Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson show, it is the direct result of congressional policies that have consciously -- and sometimes inadvertently -- skewed the playing field toward the rich.
Rather than dousing large corporations with vinegar -- as the Occupy Wall Street protesters urge -- Washington should smother them with honey. Doing so would loosen their purse strings to fund new investment, bolster the economy, and create jobs.
Foreign Affairs Editor Gideon Rose moderated this panel discussion at the Council on Foreign Relations on November 15, 2011, only hours after the city of New York removed protestors living in Zucotti Park. What does the Occupy Wall Street movement say about the state of American politics and society? Has inequality really gotten worse?
Watch the conversation between George Packer (staff writer at The New Yorker), Robert C. Lieberman (Professor of Political Science and Public Affairs at Columbia University), and Gary Clyde Hufbauer (Reginald Jones Senior Fellow at The Peterson Institute for International Economics).
We or our licensors own all content and materials on ForeignAffairs.com, including, without limitation, all trademarks, service marks, trade names, trade dress, and copyrights. You agree not to sell or modify such content or materials or reproduce, display, publicly perform, distribute, or otherwise use such content or materials in any way for any public or commercial purpose, in connection with products or services that are not those of CFR, in any other manner that is likely to cause confusion among consumers, that disparages or discredits us or its licensors, that dilutes the strength of our or our licensor’s property, or that otherwise infringes our or our licensor’s intellectual property rights.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.