Home › Features › Collections › Settling Jerusalem

Settling Jerusalem

What Comes Next for U.S.-Israel Relations?
Article Summary and Author Biography

The issue of settlements in East Jerusalem has exposed a potential rift between Israel and the United States. Should Washington rush to close that gap, or embrace it as the best chance for creating a lasting peace? Two views, by Rashid Khalidi and Bret Stephens.

Print Email
Login or Register to leave a comment.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.

Bad Faith in the Holy City: How Israel's Jerusalem Policy Imperils the Peace Process
by Rashid Khalidi

Trading Sanctions for Settlements: Obama Needs a New Mideast Policy
by Bret Stephens

Related

Snapshot, May 15, 2009
Misreading the Map
Leon Hadar

Israel is pushing the Obama administration to tackle Iran's nuclear program before the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Washington shouldn't listen.

Read
Essay, Fall 1982
The Middle East: A Turning Point?: An Israeli-Palestinian Peace
Harold H. Saunders

Given the summer's immersion in day-to-day death and destruction in Lebanon, we need to begin putting the Israeli-Palestinian War of 1982 in larger perspective. For better or worse, it will mark a turning point in the history of Israel, in the course of Arab-Israeli relations, in U.S.-Israeli relations, in the political character and orientation of important Middle Eastern states, and in the U.S. position in that critical area.

Read
Essay, Special 1983
The Crisis Areas: The Middle East: War Dangers and Receding Peace Prospects
Larry L. Fabian

American peacekeeping turned into American bloodletting in 1983. More than any event since the war and oil embargo almost exactly ten years earlier, the October 23 suicide bombing of Marine headquarters in Beirut brought the Middle East conflict home directly to vast numbers of Americans stunned by the carnage that eventually claimed 241 lives--more casualties than in any other single incident since the 1968 Tet offensive in Vietnam.

Read