What to Read on Economic Sanctions
An annotated Foreign Affairs syllabus on economic sanctions.
Related
By exposing them to the truth about their impoverishment and about the prosperity of their South Korean cousins, the United States can encourage North Koreans to change the regime in Pyongyang.
As Cold War threats have diminished, so-called weapons of mass destruction -- nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and ballistic missiles -- have become the new international bugbears. The irony is that the harm caused by these weapons pales in comparison to the havoc wreaked by a much more popular tool: economic sanctions. Tally up the casualties caused by rogue states, terrorists, and unconventional weapons, and the number is surprisingly small. The same cannot be said for deaths inflicted by international sanctions. The math is sobering and should lead the United States to reconsider its current policy of strangling Iraq.
Business lobbyists are peddling wildly inflated statistics to claim that sanctions are used too often, but America cannot have a principled foreign policy without them.

Comments
But what about these?
Here are some that are just as important:
Gary C. Hufbauer, Jeffrey Schott, and Ann Elliott. Economic Sanctions Reconsidered.
Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C., 1990, Pp. 1-47.
Dianne Rennack and Robert Shuey. Economic sanctions to achieve u.s. foreign policy goals:
Discussion and guide to current law. Congressional Research Service Report, October 1997.
Robert Pape. Why economic sanctions do not work. International Security, 22(2):90–136,
1997.
Richard Farmer. Costs of economic sanctions to the sender. World Economy, pages 93–117,
2000.