The King and Us
The exchange of oil for security no longer defines the relationship between Saudi Arabia and the United States. Still, the two countries can restore healthy ties by addressing common concerns such as Pakistan and the Palestinian territories.
Related
America's addiction to Middle Eastern oil forces dangerous foreign policy compromises, worsens global warming, and strengthens unreliable Persian Gulf countries. Instead, the United States should get its energy from biomass ethanol, a new fuel that can be produced at home from almost any type of plant or even from agricultural waste. Ethanol is environmentally friendly, compatible with the U.S. transportation system, and as potent a fuel as gasoline. Recent scientific breakthroughs have sharply lowered its production cost. Now Washington must step in with tax breaks and other incentives to encourage further research and development into this homegrown alternative to a dangerous dependence.
Thanks to a steady increase in oil output in recent years, Russia is now poised to displace Saudi Arabia as the key energy supplier to the West. But the kingdom has not welcomed Russia's gain. The emerging contest for oil dominance between Russia and Saudi Arabia will profoundly affect U.S. energy security, Russia's global role, Saudi power, and the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, not to mention the global economy.
Four authors refuel the debate on Saudi oil; Edward Morse and James Richard reply.

User Comments
Bush and Vice
Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, who developed Saudi ties during the Persian Gulf War, have been instrumental in bringing President George W. Bush together with Crown Prince Abdullah, who currently manages the kingdom’s affairs in Fahd’s stead. At the same time, public sentiment in both countries, fueled by cable television and the Internet, has played an unusually large role in the crisis. Both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia responded with elaborate campaigns to improve their national images.
America a lousy submissive?
Most know that because of the history of her Constitution, (if it still exists), Americans make lousy submissives. They are far too independent minded to accommodate the global bullies that would rely upon that method of dominance.
If global bullies insist upon making America into its submissive of the month, or the year, they are not likely to get her willing acquiescence too easily.
If Americans are confused about where they stand in foreign policy, it is the problem that her leaders are not asking whether she wants to submit, or whether she wants to stand firm.
This is the fault of media, or the fault of government itself, as elected. It surely isn't the fault of Americans.
How much compromise is America willing to make for peace?