What to Read on Transatlantic Relations
An annotated Foreign Affairs syllabus on transatlantic relations.
Related
The two world wars are the mountain ranges that dominate the historical landscape of the twentieth century. We still live in their shadows, in America as well as in Europe. Only with these wars did European and American history begin to coincide. The revolutions of 1820, 1830, 1848 and the wars leading to the unification of Italy and Germany marked the nineteenth century in European history, while the major events in American history were the westward movement, the Civil War and mass immigration. These events had certain transatlantic connections, yet not decisive ones. But in the twentieth century the two world wars have been the main events in the history of Europe and America as well.
FOR five years between 1925 and 1929, a certain portion of mankind, like those parched travelers in the desert who think they have glimpsed the oasis which will save them, believed the gate to lasting peace was at hand. This, as we now know, was only a mirage. But such a mirage had never before existed. People had never believed so fervently in the blessings of peace, or hoped so passionately that peace would be perpetual. Optimism rose to new heights. "Away with cannon and machineguns: instead, conciliation, arbitration, and peace!" At the meeting of the League of Nations on September 10, 1926, when Germany, recently defeated, was received as a member, the French Foreign Minister Aristide Briand touched a new intensity of emotion with these celebrated words.
Offers a revisionist account of Munich, noting that Hitler regarded it as 'the greatest setback to his career'. Concludes that "those commitments, policies and alliances that can reasonably be expected to involve a country in a great war must be clearly articulated, understood at least in general by the public and perceived as truly essential to the nation's security".

User Comments
The ideas and them, etc.
The idea behind any organization is what determines its existence and relevance. The context may change and a newer background may appear - in a slow coalescing of events, etc. It is always useful to note that just like the idea behind any organization usually stays alive, the ideas behind other organizations always stay alive too - with differing degrees till every trace of memory is washed away, as it were. Yet the differing time-spans and historical situations mean that traces of the one or the other shall remain and linger in history: even as a reminder of its vanquished foes. To act as the germ for the next re-birth.
It almost sounds like a recycled vision of life here! But the point is: the reliance of many people to expect perfect solutions from others - while they do not realise the reliance of their own existences to the success of those very ideas whose particular aspects they may not like. Even as the existence of people who may not like these people either.
The discovery of anti-americanism in strange places within the United States is what gets one's attention. But is it merely anti-americanism or rather the particular tendencies that one sees here: as pointing at directions that may turn anti-democracy at the end of it? What are driving those tendencies is pertinent.
The relevance of NATO is more peculiar to the changing background and the need to watch that and help ensure the security of the free world.