Star Wars Retreats?
The Obama administration's cancellation of a missile-defense network in Europe is not a sign of misguided weakness, but rather the result of a prudent reexamination of U.S. priorities. But what will come in its place?
Related
Before taking office, the new secretary of defense chaired a panel that warned that the United States would soon face a sneak attack in space. Rumsfeld was right to note that the country is more dependent on its satellites than ever before. But building antisatellite weapons will only trigger an arms race, increasing the danger for all sides.
The reelection of Ronald Reagan makes the future of his Strategic Defense Initiative the most important question of nuclear arms competition and arms control on the national agenda since 1972. The President is strongly committed to this program, and senior officials, including Secretary of Defense Caspar W. Weinberger, have made it clear that he plans to intensify this effort in his second term. Sharing the gravest reservations about this undertaking, and believing that unless it is radically constrained during the next four years it will bring vast new costs and dangers to our country and to mankind, we think it urgent to offer an assessment of the nature and hazards of this initiative, to call for the closest vigilance by Congress and the public, and even to invite the victorious President to reconsider. While we write only after obtaining the best technical advice we could find, our central concerns are political. We believe the President_s initiative to be a classic case of good intentions that will have bad results because they do not respect reality.
Toward the end of what almost immediately came to be called his "Star Wars" speech in March of 1983, President Reagan concluded an impassioned defense of his arms budget by proposing that American scientists begin research on a very advanced system that could protect the West from ballistic missile attack by the turn of the century or soon thereafter.

User Comments
Cold War is gone
The old world order is gone, so is the Cold War. Missle Defense is impractical - unless we are talking of new challengers coming from the East.
the question marks are everywhere
One agrees that the cancelation of a missile-defense network in Europe is not a sign of weakness. Rather it does show a certain maturity that looks beyond the rhetoric of ideology. As a scholar, President Obama would be someone quite familiar with the rhetorics of ideology and the politics of imagination that it entails. He would also be someone aware of the merits as well as the pitfalls of such discursive creations.
One also hopes that leaderships elsewhere too show a better comprehension of the discursive creations and of ground realities that get altered by them (creations).
The idea of a missile-defence network is not something that has anything amiss with it. It is the rhetoric that goes with it - the stated logic too forms a part of this rhetoric - that has particular implications in the stated needs. This then leaves question marks everywhere - including the issue of rogue states as well as "hollow states" ( a new term that goes for states that are functional but whose basis for claims to a state as well as democracy is seriously challenged and already compromised by the global uncivil society).
the content of this site
the content of this site usasually is very useful.