December 9, 2012
SNAPSHOT

Egypt's Constitution Conundrum

The Good, the Bad, and the Unruly in Cairo

Nathan J. Brown
NATHAN J. BROWN is Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at George Washington University.

Egypt's riot police, in front of the presidential palace in Cairo. (Amr Dalsh / Courtesy Reuters)

The final draft of Egypt's proposed new constitution, completed in late November, was produced in such a flurry of political maneuvering, threats, and shrill rhetoric that commentators and citizens alike are still trying to understand its implications. From a liberal democratic perspective, there is much to like in the document, especially compared with the one it is replacing. For example, the drafters not only specified a long list of freedoms, as their predecessors did, but also made the wording more difficult for officials to wiggle around. But the document includes just as much that causes concern. It postpones answering the question of civilian oversight of the military until the next constitution is written, years from now. And there are gaping holes and ambiguities that only politics can fill in.

And that is the critical point so often missed: political context always shapes the meaning of constitutional texts. The Arab world's experience with apparently democratic constitutional provisions confirms the rule. Democracy has failed in the Arab world not because governments have routinely violated their countries' highest laws (although they have occasionally cheated) but, rather, because their constitutions' democratic promises have generally been as vague as possible and were left to parliaments to flesh out through regular statutes. European countries first developed that system to ensure that popularly elected bodies, not kings, would define basic rights. When Arab regimes copied the practice -- for example, many of them proclaimed freedom of the press but explained that the freedom would be "defined by law" -- the effect was that rulers could pledge all kinds of rights and let rubber-stamp parliaments rob them of all meaning.

It is thus important to view the new Egyptian constitution as a political document -- a product of specific circumstances that will not merely shape a future set of circumstances but also function within them...

This is a preview of an article available to registered users of ForeignAffairs.com. If you already have an account, log in [1] to continue reading. To create an account, register [2] for access.

Copyright © 2002-2012 by the Council on Foreign Relations, Inc.
All rights reserved. To request permission to distribute or reprint this article, please fill out and submit a Permissions Request Form. If you plan to use this article in a coursepack or academic website, visit Copyright Clearance Center to clear permission.

Return to Article: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/138495/nathan-j-brown/egypts-constitution-conundrum
Home > Snapshot > Egypt's Constitution Conundrum
Published on Foreign Affairs (http://www.foreignaffairs.com)

Links:
[1] http://www.foreignaffairs.com/user
[2] https://www.foreignaffairs.com/user/register