Russia & FSU

Refine By:
Essay, JUL/AUG 2009
Robert Legvold

As it redesigns U.S. policy toward Russia, the Obama administration needs to set far more ambitious goals than it has so far -- it needs to start a comprehensive strategic dialogue.

Read
Snapshot,
Anders Åslund

At first, Russia reacted to the global economic crash with denial. Then came a period of reform. What follows next will likely decide the battle between the country's liberals and hardliners.

Read
Essay, May/June 2009
Ian Bremmer

Across the world, the free market is being overtaken by state capitalism, a system in which the state is the leading economic actor. How should the United States respond?

Read
Essay, May/June 2009
Adrian Karatnycky and Alexander J. Motyl

The recent deterioration in relations between Russia and Ukraine should be of great concern to the West, because Ukraine’s security is critical to Europe’s stability. Ukraine must be placed back on the policy agenda as a player in its own right.

Read
Essay, Mar/Apr 2009
Constanze Stelzenmüller

Germany is a bridge between Russia and the West, and how Berlin chooses to deal with Moscow will set the tone for how the United States and the rest of Europe manage their own relationships with Russia.

Read
Essay, Jan/Feb 2009
Daniel Deudney and G. John Ikenberry

Autocracies such as China and Russia do not represent a sustainable alternative to liberal democracy. In fact, the pull of liberal democracy is stronger than ever.

Read
Essay, Nov/Dec 2008
Charles King

The August war over South Ossetia has rekindled a superpower rivalry and showed the West that Moscow no longer heeds multilateral institutions.

Read
Essay, Nov/Dec 2008
Stephen Sestanovich

The next president will have to reassess the U.S.-Russian relationship and find the right balance between pushing back and cooperating.

Read
Essay, Jan/Feb 2008
Michael McFaul and Kathryn Stoner-Weiss

A growing conventional wisdom holds that Vladimir Putin's attack on democracy has brought Russia stability and prosperity -- providing a new model of successful market authoritarianism. But the correlation between autocracy and economic growth is spurious. Autocracy's effects in Russia have in fact been negative. Whatever the gains under Putin, they would have been greater under a democratic regime.

Read
Syndicate content