Defense Policy

Refine By:
Essay, JUL/AUG 2009
Andrew F. Krepinevich Jr.

The military foundations of U.S. dominance are eroding, thanks to the spread of advanced military technologies to rising powers, hostile states, and nonstate actors. In response, Washington should pursue new sources of military advantage and a more modest grand strategy.

Read
Postscript,
Milton Bearden

With its new policy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, the Obama administration has taken ownership of an orphaned conflict. But can it achieve victory, and how?

Read
Essay, Jan/Feb 2009
Robert M. Gates

The Pentagon has to do more than modernize its conventional forces; it must also focus on today's unconventional conflicts -- and tomorrow's.

Read
Essay, Jan/Feb 2009
Ivo H. Daalder and I. M. Destler

One of the most important figures in Obama’s administration will be his national security adviser. An examination of past advisers shows how to get the job right—or wrong.

Read
Essay, Jan/Feb 2009
J. Anthony Holmes

If it hopes to achieve its foreign policy agenda, the Obama administration will need to undo the damage to the Foreign Service wrought by the Bush administration.

Read
Essay, Nov/Dec 2008
Ivo Daalder and Jan Lodal

Washington must lead the way to a world without nuclear weapons. The first step will be dramatically limiting the U.S. nuclear arsenal's declared size and purpose.

Read
Essay, Jul/Aug 2008
Condoleezza Rice

The Secretary of State reflects on the lessons of the past eight years.

Read
Response, Jul/Aug 2008
Marc Sageman and Bruce Hoffman

Debating whether the real terrorist threat is top-down or bottom-up.

Read
Essay, Jan/Feb 2008
Ronald D. Asmus

After the Cold War, NATO and the EU opened their doors to central and eastern Europe, making the continent safer and freer than ever before. Today, NATO and the EU must articulate a new rationale for enlarging still further, once again extending democracy and prosperity to the East, this time in the face of a more powerful and defiant Russia.

Read
Essay, Nov/Dec 2007
Richard K. Betts

The United States now spends almost as much on defense in real dollars as it ever has before -- even though it has no plausible rationale for using most of its impressive military forces. Why? Because without political incentives for restraint, policymakers have lost the ability to think clearly about defense policy. Washington's new mantra should be "Half a trillion dollars is more than enough."

Read
Syndicate content