Baz Ratner / REUTERS

Why Kenya's Supreme Court Can't Solve the Country's Electoral Crisis

It Lacks Sufficient Enforcement Capacity

On September 1, 2017, the Supreme Court of Kenya delivered its verdict on the presidential election that took place in August and handed sitting President Uhuru Kenyatta another term despite allegations of fraud by his main rival, Raila Odinga. The opposition supporters packed into the courtroom were nervous with anticipation, but many international commentators and representatives didn’t even attend the proceedings, assuming that—as in every previous electoral petition in African history—the judiciary would find a way to uphold the initial results. In fact, the court’s four to two decision that Kenyatta’s reelection was illegal and that Kenya would …

View More on Foreign Affairs