Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee and his Pakistan counterpart Nawaz Sharif in Colombo for the SAARC summit, two months after both nations detonated nuclear devices, July 28, 1998.
Jason Reed / Reuters


Last May Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee authorized a series of nuclear tests beneath the desert sands of Rajasthan. While the aftershocks were still registering on seismographs around the world, he proclaimed India a nuclear-weapons state. Fifteen days later, Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, claiming he had no choice but to match an adversarial neighbor, ordered Pakistan's own series of tests in the Chagai Hills of Baluchistan and declared that his country, too, had nuclear arms.

The tests spurred immediate global condemnation. In all, 152 nations—large and small, developed and developing—voiced their opposition. So did numerous international organizations, including the G-8 major industrialized democracies, the Regional Forum of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, the Organization of American States, the Nordic Council of Ministers, and the Organization of the Islamic Conference. They all saw the tests as a double setback: for peace in South Asia and for international

This article is part of our premium archives.

To continue reading and get full access to our entire archive, you must subscribe.

  • Strobe Talbott, the Deputy Secretary of State, is President Clinton's envoy in talks with India and Pakistan on nonproliferation and security issues.
  • More By Strobe Talbott