AFTER eight years of independence India's foreign policy still gives rise to grave doubts in the Western mind. The reason for this is the acceptance of old definitions rather than an appreciation of the country's background and its human aspirations. The word "neutrality" as applied to India's foreign policy has little meaning. Like a hundred other oft-repeated words it has become blunted with use, and can be related to India only in the context of her past and present policies. What does neutrality—or, as we prefer to call it, non-alignment—mean and why does India follow this path?

As

This article is part of our premium archives.

To continue reading and get full access to our entire archive, you must subscribe.

Subscribe
  • VIJAYA LAKSHMI PANDIT, High Commissioner for India in London; Ambassador to Soviet Russia, 1947-49, and to the United States, 1949-51; President of the U.N. General Assembly, 1953-54
  • More By Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit