Close
Saved Anthologies

Foreign Affairs Anthology Series

The Arab Spring at Five

Buy for $8.95 Subscribe

All anthologies are free when you subscribe

Zoubeir Souissi / Reuters Police officers stand outside the parliament in Tunis March 18, 2015.
Foreign Affairs From The Anthology: The Arab Spring at Five
Explore the Anthology
Essay July/August 2011 Issue Middle EastNorth Africa

Read More On... My FA Anthologies

Politics & Society Civil Society Political Development Democratization

Why Middle East Studies Missed the Arab Spring

The Myth of Authoritarian Stability

By F. Gregory Gause III

About the Author:

My FA Anthologies
F. GREGORY GAUSE III is Professor of Political Science at the University of Vermont.
Read more by F. Gregory Gause III

The vast majority of academic specialists on the Arab world were as surprised as everyone else by the upheavals that toppled two Arab leaders last winter and that now threaten several others. It was clear that Arab regimes were deeply unpopular and faced serious demographic, economic, and political problems. Yet many academics focused on explaining what they saw as the most interesting and anomalous aspect of Arab politics: the persistence of undemocratic rulers.

Until this year, the Arab world boasted a long list of such leaders. Muammar al-Qaddafi took charge of Libya in 1969; the Assad family has ruled Syria since 1970; Ali Abdullah Saleh became president of North Yemen (later united with South Yemen) in 1978; Hosni Mubarak took charge of Egypt in 1981; and Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali ascended to Tunisia's presidency in 1987. The monarchies enjoyed even longer pedigrees, with the Hashemites running Jordan since its creation in 1920, the al-Saud family ruling a unified Saudi Arabia since 1932, and the Alaouite dynasty in Morocco first coming to power in the seventeenth century.

These regimes survived over a period of decades in which democratic waves rolled through East Asia, eastern Europe, Latin America, and sub-Saharan Africa. Even the Arab countries' neighbors in the Muslim Middle East (Iran and Turkey) experienced enormous political change in that period, with a revolution and three subsequent decades of political struggle in Iran and a quasi-Islamist party building a more open and democratic system in secular Turkey.

For many Middle East specialists, this remarkable record of regime stability in the face of numerous challenges demanded their attention and an explanation. I am one of those specialists. In the pages of this magazine in 2005 ("Can Democracy Stop Terrorism?" September/ October 2005), I argued that the United States should not encourage democracy in the Arab world because Washington's authoritarian Arab allies represented stable bets for the future. On that count, I was spectacularly wrong. I also predicted that democratic Arab governments would prove much less likely to cooperate with U.S. foreign policy

Loading, please wait...

Related Articles

This site uses cookies to improve your user experience. Click here to learn more.

Continue