The devastating tsunami that struck South Asia on December 26 has left an untold number of orphans in its wake. Since then, governmental and charitable organizations around the world have been flooded with phone calls and emails asking how these children can be adopted. The simple answer is that adopting the tsunami's orphans is near impossible--and that situation is unlikely to change anytime soon.
This may seem like a scandalous conclusion--and a harsh counterpoint to all the humanitarian aid that has flowed to the region--but it is understandable, if no less tragic, given the complex and multifaceted nature of the issue. Put simply, it is the unfortunate result of international legal standards that govern adoption policies in the "host" countries that welcome adopted children and the "home" countries that supply them.
The U.S. Department of State, which is responsible for articulating U.S. international adoption policy, has flatly refused permission to Americans who wish to adopt the tsunami orphans. Other industrial states have adopted a similarly strict position, largely because they seek to uphold the multilateral agreement that governs international adoptions, the so-called "Hague Convention."
Under the treaty, host and home governments must determine together which children can legally be adopted through an in-depth, case-by-case examination of the circumstances under which the children have become available for adoption. The point is to ensure that children have not been put up for adoption for monetary gain and that their parents gave them up freely, of their own accord.