×

Drones Over Damascus

What Their Absence From the Syria Debate Means About Their Usefulness

Free Syrian Army fighters watch smoke rising from buildings at the front line in Aleppo, December 26, 2012. Ahmed Jadallah / Courtesy Reuters

For the past four years, Americans have been preoccupied with drone technology as a cheap, low-risk, and discriminate way to eliminate emerging global threats without getting entangled in protracted conflicts. The U.S. government has even dramatically changed its military force structure to make armed drones a lynchpin of U.S. power projection. Yet these weapons have been virtually useless in the last two conflicts that the United States has faced, first in Libya and now in Syria. Why is that?

Broadly speaking, the United States has used armed drone strikes overseas in two ways: during war and to prevent war. Battlefield use of weaponized drones is not new (it dates back to World War I), and is fairly ubiquitous. A spring 2013 report by the U.S. Air Force estimated that unmanned aircraft fired about a quarter of all missiles used in coalition air strikes in Afghanistan in the early

Loading, please wait...

Related Articles

This site uses cookies to improve your user experience. Click here to learn more.

Continue