Skip to main content

A NOTHER article on disengagement? Surely, after the number that have recently appeared, after the spate of speeches, broadcasts and interviews on the subject, there can be nothing more to say. My excuse for nevertheless discussing it again is that, despite all that has been said and written, there still appear to be much misunderstanding and confusion about what exactly the advocates of disengagement want and why they want it.

This is partly because the single word "disengagement" has been used to describe a number of totally different propositions ranging all the way from some "thinning out" of forces on both sides of the Iron Curtain in Europe to the complete removal of United States forces across the Atlantic. Those of us who have tried to put forward reasonably precise proposals which do not involve the withdrawal of American or British forces even from continental Europe may be pardoned if

This article is part of our premium archives.

To continue reading and get full access to our entire archive, you must subscribe.

Subscribe

Most Read Articles

The Endless Fantasy of American Power

Neither Trump Nor Biden Aims to Demilitarize Foreign Policy

Andrew Bacevich

An Asian Pandemic Success Story

What SARS Taught Governments About Fighting Infectious Disease

Swee Kheng Khor and David Heymann

How a Great Power Falls Apart

Decline Is Invisible From the Inside

Charles King

Giving Up on God

The Global Decline of Religion

Ronald F. Inglehart