Skip to main content

For four decades, successive Republican and Democratic administrations resisted answering the question of whether the United States would come to Taiwan’s defense if China mounted an armed attack. Washington’s deliberate ambiguity on the matter helped dissuade China from attempting to “reunify” Taiwan with the mainland, as it could not be sure that the United States would remain on the sidelines. At the same time, the policy discouraged Taiwan from declaring independence—a step that would have precipitated a cross-strait crisis—because its leaders could not be sure of unequivocal U.S. support.

The policy known as strategic ambiguity

Most Read Articles

Putin the Great

Russia’s Imperial Impostor

Susan B. Glasser

China’s Sputnik Moment?

How Washington Boosted Beijing’s Quest for Tech Dominance

Dan Wang

The Fulbright Paradox

Race and the Road to a New American Internationalism

Charles King

Ukraine Is Part of the West

NATO and the EU Should Treat It That Way

Dmytro Kuleba