Skip to main content
July/August 2022 cover
Foreign Affairs Magazine Homepage
Subscribe
Explore Subscribe
  • All Articles
  • Books & Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Anthologies
  • Author Directory
  • This Day in History
  • Events
  • Biden Administration
  • War in Ukraine
  • Coronavirus
  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity
  • Nationalism
  • Democratization
  • Economics
  • Globalization
  • Migration
  • U.S. Foreign Policy
  • War & Military Strategy
  • United States
  • Ukraine
  • Russia
  • China
  • Iran
  • North Korea
  • United Kingdom
  • India
  • Afghanistan
  • Ethiopia
  • Essays
  • Snapshots
  • Articles with Audio
  • Capsule Reviews
  • Review Essays
  • Ask the Experts
  • Reading Lists
  • Interviews
  • Responses
  • 1920s
  • 1930s
  • 1940s
  • 1950s
  • 1960s
  • 1970s
  • 1980s
  • 1990s
  • 2000s
  • 2010s
  • 2020s
  • Newsletters
  • Customer Service
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Subscriber Resources
  • Feedback
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Gift a Subscription
  • Centennial
  • Contact
  • Advertise

Follow Us

Foreign Affairs Magazine Homepage
Explore
My Account Sign In

  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Books & Reviews
  • Anthologies
  • Podcast
  • Newsletters
Search
Subscribe
Subscribe Sign in
Subscribe to newsletter
No, thanks
May/June 2017 Issue

Present At the Destruction?

Present at the Destruction?
  • May/June 2017
  • 01 The Plot Against American Foreign Policy
  • 02 A Vision of Trump at War
  • 03 Is America Still Safe for Democracy?
  • 04 The Case for Trump’s Foreign Policy

What’s Inside

May/June 2017
Sign in and save to read later
Share
Print this article
Save
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Send by email
Get a link
Request Reprint Permissions

Covering the Trump administration is difficult because it requires disentangling three strands of its behavior: the normal, the incompetent, and the dangerous. 

The normal aspect—the administration’s conventional Republican policies and appointments—is, broadly speaking, politics as usual. The amateur aspect—its early fumbling and bumbling—is what one finds every time power changes hands, exacerbated by an unusually inexperienced incoming team. The danger is unique. 

Every administration spins, fights with the press and the bureaucracy, pushes its own agenda, and tries to evade intrusive oversight. But ordinary White Houses do not repeatedly lie, declare war on mainstream media institutions, pursue radical goals while disdaining professional input, and refuse to accept independent scrutiny. 

How seriously you take these behaviors depends on how you assess the motivations behind them, generating a game that some have taken to calling “Stupid or nefarious?” or “Veep or House of Cards?” Do slow appointments signal poor management or a deliberate attempt to “deconstruct the administrative state,” as Trump guru Steve Bannon says? Is dismissing experienced senior officials en masse just a clumsy way of handling a presidential transition or a purge of potential obstacles and whistleblowers? Are all the lies mere venting or a deliberate plot to distract critics and undermine reasoned discourse?

Damage is already being done. In our lead package, G. John Ikenberry details the harm the administration is inflicting on the liberal international order. Philip Gordon traces how a continuation of the administration’s early course could lead to three different wars. And Robert Mickey, Steven Levitsky, and Lucan Way document the ongoing deterioration of American democratic norms and practices. 

Foreign Affairs, as its editorial manifesto stated almost a century ago, “will tolerate wide differences of opinion.” As always, our pages and pixels are open to all articles that are “competent and well informed, representing honest opinions seriously held and convincingly expressed.” We will not hesitate to offer readers defenses of administration policy, such as the article by Matthew Kroenig that rounds out the package. But nor will we shy away from offering criticisms and warnings as appropriate. And rarely, if ever, have those criticisms and warnings seemed so urgent and important.

—Gideon Rose, Editor

More:
Trump Administration

Most-Read Articles

Beijing Is Still Playing the Long Game on Taiwan

Why China Isn’t Poised to Invade

Andrew J. Nathan

Can Putin Survive?

The Lessons of the Soviet Collapse

Vladislav Zubok

How Ukraine Will Win

Kyiv’s Theory of Victory

Dmytro Kuleba

What Money Can’t Buy

The Limits of Economic Power

Barry Eichengreen

Get the Magazine

Save up to 55%

on Foreign Affairs magazine!
Subscribe

Foreign Affairs

Weekly Newsletter

Get in-depth analysis delivered right to your inbox
About
About Us Staff Events Work at Foreign Affairs Podcast
Contact
Customer Service Contact Us Submissions Permissions Advertise Press Center Leave Us Feedback Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription
Subscriptions Group Subscriptions My Account Give a Gift Donate Download iOS App Newsletters Download Android App
Follow
Graduate School Forum
Council on Foreign Relations

From the
publishers of
Foreign Affairs

Cyber Week in Review: June 24, 2022
by Adam Segal
What Can Be Learned From Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s First Weeks in Office?
by Joshua Kurlantzick
How NATO Will Change If Finland and Sweden Become Members
by Jonathan Masters

Published by the Council on Foreign Relations

Privacy Policy Terms of Use

©2022 Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Loading Loading