Skip to main content
March/April 2021 cover
Cart Subscribe Sign in
Explore Subscribe
  • Sections
  • Account
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Anthologies
  • Books & Reviews
  • Interviews
  • This Day in History
  • Author Directory
  • Events
  • Career Center
  • Coronavirus
  • U.S. Foreign Policy
  • Economics
  • Security
  • Environment
  • Climate Change
  • Biden Administration
  • War & Military Strategy
  • China
  • Middle East
  • India
  • Russia & FSU
  • United States
  • Iran
  • Turkey
  • United Kingdom
  • View All Regions >
  • Essays
  • Snapshots
  • Articles with Audio
  • Interviews
  • Responses
  • Review Essays
  • Capsule Reviews
  • Reading Lists
  • Ask the Experts
  • Foreign Affairs This Week
  • The Backstory
  • Foreign Affairs Today
  • Weekend Read
  • Books & Reviews
  • Foreign Affairs Career Adviser
  • Customer Service
  • Subscriber Resources
  • Feedback
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Gift a Subscription
  • Contact

Follow Us

Magazine Become a Member Save up to 55% on Foreign Affairs
Subscribe Sign In
Explore

  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Books & Reviews
  • Anthologies
  • Newsletters
Search
Subscribe
Subscribe Sign in

How Impeachment Has Shaped U.S. Foreign Policy

Photo Illustration by Ricky Ferrer / Foreign Affairs
Introduction
  • How Impeachment Has Shaped U.S. Foreign Policy
  • 01 The Wounded Presidency, Part One
  • 02 The Wounded Presidency, Part Two
  • 03 Trump Hijacked U.S. Foreign Policy During His Impeachment

The Wounded Presidency

How Impeachment Has Shaped U.S. Foreign Policy

January 28, 2020
Sign in and save to read later
Save to Pocket
Share
Print this article
Save
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Send by email
Get a link

Historians who study impeachment tend to treat it as a domestic political affair: the bloody combat of partisan politics taken to its extreme, threatening the very survival of a presidency. But when the commander in chief must fight for his political life, the repercussions inevitably ripple around the world. In theory at least, foreign policy and domestic politics are supposed to occupy separate domains. In practice, presidents face tremendous pressure to use foreign policy to bolster their domestic political fortunes—never more so than when they face the threat of impeachment. U.S. adversaries can likewise be tempted to exploit a weakened American president to advance their regional ambitions or to subvert the international system. Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton both faced challenges from U.S. adversaries when their presidencies were on the line, and both sought flashy foreign policy achievements that would distract from their political woes.  

In this exhaustive three-part series, CNN presidential historian Timothy Naftali plumbs the Nixon and Clinton impeachment sagas for insight into the global dimensions of President Donald Trump’s current crisis. Naftali, who is an associate clinical professor of public service at New York University, draws on reams of recently declassified documents as well as memoirs, oral histories, and other archival materials to weave together the previously untold story of U.S. foreign policy during the last two impeachment crises. Part One examines the Watergate scandal, during which Nixon’s controversial policy of détente with the Soviet Union lay on the line. An addled president nonetheless delegated his foreign policy to an enormously empowered secretary of state, Henry Kissinger. Part Two delves into the 1998 impeachment, during which Clinton did the opposite, keeping a tight leash on his national security aides as they sought to broker an attention-grabbing peace deal in the Middle East. The lessons from these two historical episodes are manifold, and they help to explain how the world has reacted to Trump’s impeachment drama, which is explored in Part Three.

— The editors of Foreign Affairs

More:
Domestic Politics U.S. Foreign Policy Trump Administration Clinton Administration Nixon Administration Presidential Impeachment The Best of 2020

Most-Read Articles

A Superpower, Like It or Not

Why Americans Must Accept Their Global Role

Robert Kagan

The Real Regional Problem With the Iran Deal

Some Players Prefer for Washington and Tehran to Remain at Odds

Trita Parsi

Democracy on the Defense

Turning Back the Authoritarian Tide

Yascha Mounk

The Nuclear Option

Slowing a New Arms Race Means Compromising on Missile Defenses

Jeffrey Lewis

Get the Magazine

Save up to 55%

on Foreign Affairs magazine!

Subscribe

Foreign Affairs

Weekly Newsletter

Get in-depth analysis delivered right to your inbox

About

About Us Staff Careers Events Work at Foreign Affairs

Contact

Customer Service Contact Us Submissions Permissions Advertise Press Center Leave Us Feedback Frequently Asked Questions

Subscription

Subscriptions Group Subscriptions My Account Give a Gift Donate Download iOS App Newsletters Download Android App

Follow

Graduate School Forum

Council on Foreign Relations

From the
publishers of
Foreign Affairs

The Most:

Recent Shared Viewed

How Saudi Arabia Gets Away With Murder

by Steven A. Cook

Nigeria's Vice President Speaks Plainly on Population and Food

by John Campbell

Biden and Iran: Two Questions

by Author:Elliott Abrams

The Link Between Foreign Languages and U.S. National Security

Aung San Suu Kyi’s Major Speech on Rakhine State

by Joshua Kurlantzick

Creating a State Department Office for American State and Local Diplomacy

by Alyssa Ayres

Books & Reports

The U.S. War in Afghanistan

by Zachary Laub

U.S. Relations With China

by CFR.org Editors

Published by the Council on Foreign Relations

Privacy Policy Terms of Use

©2021 Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

This site uses cookies to improve your user experience. Click here to learn more.